From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@riverviewtech.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] Layer 3 switching...
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 20:56:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4705538C.7070403@riverviewtech.net> (raw)
Is it even possible or even worth while to do layer 3 switching
(bridging) on a Linux system?
Or would this be considered routing even though everything is done on
OSI Layer 2?
Which would be faster, Layer 3 switching (bridging) on OSI Layer 2 or
routing on OSI Layer 3?
Grant. . . .
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
next reply other threads:[~2007-10-04 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-04 20:56 Grant Taylor [this message]
2007-10-05 10:05 ` [LARTC] Layer 3 switching John Default
2007-10-05 14:48 ` Grant Taylor
2007-10-06 11:16 ` John Default
2007-10-06 12:39 ` Mohan Sundaram
2007-10-08 14:48 ` Grant Taylor
2007-10-08 15:00 ` Grant Taylor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4705538C.7070403@riverviewtech.net \
--to=gtaylor@riverviewtech.net \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.