Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 9/30/07, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid> wrote:
>> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 13:42 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 12:22 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>>>>>  And a third
>>>>>>> one only gives me "Detected illicit call from domain Xenomai" before the
>>>>>>> box reboots. :(
>>>>>> Grmff... Do you run with your smp_processor_id() instrumentation in?
>>>>> Yes, but I suspect this is just a symptom of some severe memory
>>>>> corruption that (also?) hits I-pipe data structures. I just put in some
>>>>> different instrumentation, and that warning is gone, the box just hangs
>>>>> hard at a different point. Very unfriendly.
>>>> Hah! Got some crash log by hacking a raw printk-to-uart:
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>> <6>Xenomai: starting RTDM services.
>>>> <6>NET: Registered protocol family 10
>>>> <6>lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions
>>>> <6>ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
>>>> <3>I-pipe: Detected illicit call from domain 'Xenomai'
>>>> <3>        into a service reserved for domain 'Linux' and below.
>>>>        f3a6bc18 00000000 00000000 c05dad6c f3a6bc3c c0105fc3 c03513c7 c05dc100
>>>>        00000009 f3a6bc54 c01479cb c03592f8 c0357ae2 c035e069 f3a6bc88 f3a6bc70
>>>>        c0127224 c0111df8 00000000 f3a6bd74 00000000 f3a6bd74 f3a6bc80 c012727f
>>>> Call Trace:
>>>>  [<c010520f>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1f/0x40
>>>>  [<c01052e1>] show_stack_log_lvl+0xb1/0xe0
>>>>  [<c0105fc3>] show_stack+0x33/0x40
>>>>  [<c01479cb>] ipipe_check_context+0x7b/0x90
>>>>  [<c0127224>] __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x24/0x60
>>>>  [<c012727f>] atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x1f/0x30
>>>>  [<c0131e02>] notify_die+0x32/0x40
>>>>  [<c0105d29>] do_invalid_op+0x59/0xa0
>>>>  [<c0111d0b>] __ipipe_handle_exception+0x7b/0x144
>>>>  [<c02dfaeb>] error_code+0x6f/0x7c
>>> Wow. Why that?
>>>
>>>>  [<c0111d13>] __ipipe_handle_exception+0x83/0x144
>>>>  [<c02dfaeb>] error_code+0x6f/0x7c
>>> And this? We should not get any exception over an IPI3 handler. I guess
>>> the double fault may be explained by this root cause.
>>>
>>>>  [<c01117df>] __ipipe_handle_irq+0x4f/0x140
>>>>  [<c0104c5e>] ipipe_ipi3+0x26/0x40
>>> Our LAPIC timer vector. Are you running full modular or statically btw?
>> Fully modular. Compiling the nucleus in makes the lock-up move to
>> another, once again invisible spot.
>>
>> I nailed down the fault address in the scenario above. It's in the
>> nucleus module, at the first byte of xntimer_tick_aperiodic. Are we
>> loosing module text pages over the time? This functions must have been
>> executed before as the timer was armed while I collected the
>> /proc/modules and then triggered the crash.
> 
> There is a pending issue about vmalloced areas, which I completely forgot:
> https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-core/2007-02/msg00138.html
> 

Ooops. By reading all my mails, I would have avoided reinventing this
wheel on my own. Your patch is almost what I posted yesterday to fix the
vmalloc issue.

Looks like we no longer need the last hunk of it on recent kernels, right?

Jan

PS: We should really consider using bug trackers for Adeos and Xenomai!
I have a few (minor) patches hanging around as well, but things quickly
get lost when bigger problems pop up.