roland Tollenaar wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>>> which adeos patch must I use?
>> There is none for this kernel on i386 (assuming this is your arch). The
>> easiest thing is to move forward to 2.6.22 - or you would have to
>> back-port that patch... ;)
> Ouch. How is that for bad luck.
> 
>> Xenomai 2.4 is required for kernels beyond 2.6.20 anyway.
> Great.
> 
>> But note that we are still sweeping out remaining bugs around this
>> kernel, see "Fix __ipipe_pin_range_globally" and "IO-APIC stall due to
>> broken fasteoi handling" on Xenomai-core / Adeos-main. Moreover, today's
>> SVN breaks at least my test box. So you may want to wait a few days at
>> least, until the dust (hopefully) settled down again.
> Not so great. But then, this at least gives me some time to upgrade to 2.6.22

Just checked again: The problem is still limited to kernels with
CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS or CONFIG_NO_HZ. So you can already do your tests
with those features disabled and the two mentioned patches applied.

Jan