From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
hadi@cyberus.ca, krkumar2@in.ibm.com, johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, kaber@trash.net,
shemminger@linux-foundation.org, jagana@us.ibm.com,
Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se, rick.jones2@hp.com, xma@us.ibm.com,
gaagaan@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, rdreier@cisco.com,
mcarlson@broadcom.com, mchan@broadcom.com,
general@lists.openfabrics.org, tgraf@suug.ch,
randy.dunlap@oracle.com, sri@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3][NET_BATCH] net core use batching
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:04:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <470BD0B7.4070607@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D5C1322C3E673F459512FB59E0DDC32903C0821A@orsmsx414.amr.corp.intel.com>
Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P wrote:
>> IMO the net driver really should provide a hint as to what it wants.
>>
>> 8139cp and tg3 would probably prefer multiple TX queue
>> behavior to match silicon behavior -- strict prio.
>
> If I understand what you just said, I disagree. If your hardware is
> running strict prio, you don't want to enforce strict prio in the qdisc
> layer; performing two layers of QoS is excessive, and may lead to
> results you don't want. The reason I added the DRR qdisc is for the Si
> that has its own queueing strategy that is not RR. For Si that
> implements RR (like e1000), you can either use the DRR qdisc, or if you
> want to prioritize your flows, use PRIO.
A misunderstanding, I think.
To my brain, DaveM's item #2 seemed to assume/require the NIC hardware
to balance fairly across hw TX rings, which seemed to preclude the
8139cp/tg3 style of strict-prio hardware. That's what I was responding to.
As long as there is some modular way to fit 8139cp/tg3 style multi-TX
into our universe, I'm happy :)
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-09 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-08 18:26 [PATCH 2/3][NET_BATCH] net core use batching jamal
2007-10-08 19:46 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-10-08 20:48 ` jamal
2007-10-08 21:26 ` [ofa-general] " David Miller
2007-10-08 22:34 ` jamal
2007-10-08 22:36 ` [ofa-general] " Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-10-08 22:33 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-10-08 23:40 ` jamal
2007-10-09 1:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-09 1:41 ` [ofa-general] " David Miller
2007-10-09 2:01 ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-09 2:03 ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-09 2:04 ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-09 2:15 ` jamal
2007-10-09 2:16 ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-09 2:19 ` [ofa-general] " jamal
2007-10-09 2:20 ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-09 2:45 ` [ofa-general] " David Miller
2007-10-09 2:43 ` David Miller
2007-10-09 2:46 ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-09 2:12 ` [ofa-general] " Jeff Garzik
2007-10-09 2:46 ` David Miller
2007-10-09 18:48 ` [ofa-general] " Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-10-09 19:04 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2007-10-09 19:07 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-10-09 2:14 ` [ofa-general] " jamal
2007-10-09 2:16 ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-09 2:47 ` [ofa-general] " David Miller
2007-10-09 16:51 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-09 18:22 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-09 18:30 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-09 20:43 ` David Miller
2007-10-09 20:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-09 21:22 ` David Miller
2007-10-09 21:56 ` jamal
2007-10-10 0:04 ` David Miller
2007-10-10 0:37 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-10 0:50 ` David Miller
2007-10-10 9:16 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-10 9:25 ` David Miller
2007-10-10 10:23 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-10 10:44 ` David Miller
2007-10-10 13:08 ` jamal
2007-10-10 22:37 ` David Miller
2007-10-10 15:35 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-10-10 16:02 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-10 16:42 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2007-10-10 9:53 ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-12 16:08 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2007-10-12 17:05 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-12 18:29 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-12 18:27 ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-10 16:02 ` Bill Fink
2007-10-10 22:53 ` David Miller
2007-10-11 6:52 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-10-09 1:31 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-09 10:58 ` [ofa-general] " Krishna Kumar2
2007-10-09 11:02 ` David Miller
2007-10-09 11:20 ` [ofa-general] " Krishna Kumar2
2007-10-09 11:21 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-10-09 11:24 ` David Miller
2007-10-09 12:44 ` [ofa-general] " Jeff Garzik
2007-10-09 12:55 ` Herbert Xu
2007-10-09 13:00 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-09 20:14 ` David Miller
2007-10-09 20:20 ` [ofa-general] " Jeff Garzik
2007-10-09 21:25 ` David Miller
2007-10-09 20:22 ` [ofa-general] " Roland Dreier
2007-10-09 20:51 ` David Miller
2007-10-09 21:40 ` Roland Dreier
2007-10-09 22:44 ` [ofa-general] " Roland Dreier
2007-10-09 22:46 ` [ofa-general] [PATCH 1/4] IPoIB: Fix unused variable warning Roland Dreier
2007-10-09 22:47 ` [ofa-general] [PATCH 2/4] ibm_emac: Convert to use napi_struct independent of struct net_device Roland Dreier
2007-10-09 22:47 ` [PATCH 3/4] ibm_new_emac: Nuke SET_MODULE_OWNER() use Roland Dreier
2007-10-09 22:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] ibm_emac: Convert to use napi_struct independent of struct net_device Roland Dreier
2007-10-09 22:51 ` [ofa-general] " Roland Dreier
2007-10-09 23:17 ` [PATCH 1/4] IPoIB: Fix unused variable warning David Miller
2007-10-10 0:32 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-10 0:47 ` [ofa-general] " Jeff Garzik
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-10-08 5:03 [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH 2/3][NET_BATCH] net core use batching Krishna Kumar2
2007-10-08 13:17 ` jamal
2007-09-14 9:00 [PATCH 0/10 REV5] Implement skb batching and support in IPoIB/E1000 Krishna Kumar
2007-09-16 23:17 ` [ofa-general] " David Miller
2007-09-17 0:29 ` jamal
2007-09-23 17:53 ` [PATCHES] TX batching jamal
2007-09-23 17:56 ` [ofa-general] [PATCH 1/4] [NET_SCHED] explict hold dev tx lock jamal
2007-09-23 17:58 ` [ofa-general] [PATCH 2/4] [NET_BATCH] Introduce batching interface jamal
2007-09-23 18:00 ` [PATCH 3/4][NET_BATCH] net core use batching jamal
2007-09-30 18:52 ` [ofa-general] [PATCH 2/3][NET_BATCH] " jamal
2007-10-01 4:11 ` Bill Fink
2007-10-01 13:30 ` jamal
2007-10-02 4:25 ` [ofa-general] " Bill Fink
2007-10-02 13:20 ` jamal
2007-10-03 5:29 ` [ofa-general] " Bill Fink
2007-10-03 13:42 ` jamal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=470BD0B7.4070607@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gaagaan@gmail.com \
--cc=general@lists.openfabrics.org \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jagana@us.ibm.com \
--cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
--cc=mcarlson@broadcom.com \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=sri@us.ibm.com \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
--cc=xma@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.