From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [89.96.204.112] (helo=www-zirak-new.zirak.it) by linuxtogo.org with smtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IfljZ-00015H-IT for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 02:17:01 +0200 Received: (qmail 32197 invoked by uid 64017); 11 Oct 2007 00:05:47 -0000 Received: from 82.56.154.194 (filippo@zirak.it@82.56.154.194) by www-zirak-new (envelope-from , uid 64011) with qmail-scanner-2.01 (uvscan: v5.1.00/v5052. bogofilter: 0.92.0. spamassassin: 3.0.4. Clear:RC:1(82.56.154.194):. Processed in 0.011752 secs); 11 Oct 2007 00:05:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.3?) (filippo@zirak.it@82.56.154.194) by www-zirak-new.zirak.it with SMTP; 11 Oct 2007 00:05:47 -0000 Message-ID: <470D6A2C.1000909@linux.it> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 02:11:24 +0200 From: Filippo Basso User-Agent: IceDove 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070730) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <470B9D9D.5080501@linux.it> In-Reply-To: <470B9D9D.5080501@linux.it> Subject: Re: different hosts, different OE images X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:17:01 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > I understood that the results should be highly independent from host > system, so I begun debugging a bit. > Hi everybody, my investigation is going ahead... The main point is: an image should be highly independent from the host system, but seems that I've some problem in this regards... maybe my mistake, but should be understood. Another machine (Ubuntu) gave even another different runtime result... :-( Now I've debugged differences in the log.do_compile files, and have these "strange" results: * the order of gcc arguments is not always fixed, depends on the machine (es: ipkg, perl) * in many packages the make[n] is make[n+1], sometimes there is a duplicated chdir, or there is a duplicated message like "OE: Not hardcoding..." * in many packages on lenny is present in the options for "ccache i586-angstrom-linux-gcc" a -L/usr/lib (isn't that potentially dangerous???) Not OE-related, more .bb recipy-related: * minimo is using gcc (and not i586-angstrom-linux-gcc), so is failing on etch and working on lenny (I've to investigate more if this can work, imagine if I want to use an ARM, hehehe!) * and a strange behaviour in coreutils-native (this I've to investigate more, about openat.c and getcwd.c, maybe not a OE issue) To be sure that the versions are the same, the OE tree is the same (mtn status: 1c938b19625a9b636c77145c8a420c71768f0595), bitbake is the same, I've double checked everything. Now it's late night, I'll investigate ubuntu problems (X11 restarting continuously) with same image compiling on lenny, not compiling on etch... some suggestions? thank you 10000! phy