From: "René Scharfe" <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
To: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Cc: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>, Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com>,
Junio Hamano <junkio@cox.net>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Bisect dunno
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:13:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4712400C.2080900@lsrfire.ath.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200710141709.51579.chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Christian Couder schrieb:
> Le dimanche 14 octobre 2007, David Kastrup a écrit :
>> Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com> writes:
>>> El 14/10/2007, a las 14:28, Christian Couder escribió:
>>>> Here is my bisect dunno patch series again.
>>> Good work on the series, Christian, but don't you think that
>>> "unknown" would sound a little bit better than "dunno"? For people
>>> who don't speak English as a second language "dunno" might not be
>>> immediately clear.
>> "undecided"?
>
> I choosed "dunno" because that was what Dscho suggested in this thread:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/53584/focus=53595
>
> It seems to me short and understandable at the same time.
>
> More meaningfull would be "untestable" or "cannottest" or "canttest" but
> it's much longer, while "good" and "bad" are short.
Ugly? Neutral?
René
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-14 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-14 12:28 [PATCH 0/7] Bisect dunno Christian Couder
2007-10-14 12:43 ` Wincent Colaiuta
2007-10-14 12:59 ` Wincent Colaiuta
2007-10-14 13:00 ` David Kastrup
2007-10-14 15:09 ` Christian Couder
2007-10-14 15:09 ` David Kastrup
2007-10-14 15:14 ` Andreas Ericsson
2007-10-14 16:13 ` René Scharfe [this message]
2007-10-14 16:25 ` David Kastrup
2007-10-14 16:35 ` Wincent Colaiuta
2007-10-14 17:24 ` Marius Storm-Olsen
2007-10-14 17:48 ` David Kastrup
2007-10-15 6:04 ` Marius Storm-Olsen
2007-10-15 6:15 ` David Symonds
2007-10-15 7:02 ` Johan Herland
2007-10-15 9:31 ` Wincent Colaiuta
2007-10-15 11:53 ` David Symonds
2007-10-15 20:33 ` Geert Bosch
2007-10-15 20:47 ` David Kastrup
2007-10-16 6:07 ` David Symonds
2007-10-16 6:17 ` David Kastrup
2007-10-17 16:10 ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-10-17 16:13 ` David Kastrup
2007-10-17 16:17 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-10-17 19:23 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-10-17 22:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-17 23:46 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-10-17 23:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-18 1:24 ` David Symonds
[not found] ` <200710190449.49477.chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
2007-10-19 2:49 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-10-16 3:41 ` Christian Couder
2007-10-15 8:25 ` David Kastrup
2007-10-14 17:25 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-10-14 16:16 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-10-17 7:35 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-10-17 18:10 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-10-17 23:36 ` Christian Couder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4712400C.2080900@lsrfire.ath.cx \
--to=rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=dak@gnu.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=win@wincent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.