From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Sun, 14 Oct 2007 20:38:12 +0100 (BST) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.184]:37343 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20035414AbXJNTiD (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Oct 2007 20:38:03 +0100 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c10so1094751nfd for ; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 12:38:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=a0V4KC5wcxV6qCZp4IzVExB7mmnr7KTbLDbRQCIcrHo=; b=WwRVcVmGbig9USMhA4V55B5iaVlTyY3hrGf9zy9oYukEysQwyxV25U1kZfLP9s1wL73KEwYoBcXKT5WpLFNca/ZsR4IjAqdRBD+/qYo/+fVNoUkeWb/BXDHZ+kOw1kUUINnUR7XipJBD1rQC5YlbbcX1G7UVaT9e7eqqZDNkkE0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=H1Cz1wGKVg9ksos5xeqC5xUx4SicCVhMh0oiMBf94/KMrFHTPRwWUqEuQMo9rn0vQUFtUPNgWfnH2wQGZC7prmTvuk7tPKmJxhh5CfN2L6AfkLWWKbikKEhvzxZI9y0FAVt2g/bBrTNCDi1UJYgc3KF2+zz4W71qaeytEOoi5Tg= Received: by 10.86.58.3 with SMTP id g3mr4364735fga.1192390683006; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 12:38:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.1? ( [82.235.205.153]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i5sm5734970mue.2007.10.14.12.38.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 14 Oct 2007 12:38:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <47126FEE.5000400@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:37:18 +0200 From: Franck Bui-Huu User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" CC: Nigel Stephens , Ralf Baechle , Thiemo Seufer , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [SPAM?] Re: [PATCH] mm/pg-r4k.c: Dump the generated code References: <20071002141125.GC16772@networkno.de> <20071002154918.GA11312@linux-mips.org> <47038874.9050704@gmail.com> <20071003131158.GL16772@networkno.de> <4703F155.4000301@gmail.com> <20071003201800.GP16772@networkno.de> <47049734.6050802@gmail.com> <20071004121557.GA28928@linux-mips.org> <4705004C.5000705@gmail.com> <4705EFE5.7090704@gmail.com> <470A4349.9090301@gmail.com> <470BE1F4.3070800@gmail.com> <470CC0CE.9080303@mips.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 17022 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: vagabon.xyz@gmail.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > Though either way I am not sure these would have to be put in Kconfig or > Makefile anywhere. A generic way should be enough for the insistent as > the potentially useful options may proliferate; we have the CFLAGS_KERNEL > and CFLAGS_MODULE Makefile variables that would suit for setting upon > `make' invocation. > In that case very few people would use this optimization. We could just have one new Kconfig option in kernel hacking submenu: config EXTRA_CFLAGS string help If you want to pass additionnal option to GCC for optimization purpose for example, use this. Franck