From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.genesi-usa.com (mithrandir.softwarenexus.net [66.98.186.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D1CDDEDE for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 06:54:17 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4713D3D6.6070203@genesi-usa.com> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:55:50 +0100 From: Matt Sealey MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] bestcomm: core bestcomm support for Freescale MPC5200 References: <20071014044041.23438.14070.stgit@trillian.cg.shawcable.net> <20071014044205.23438.36036.stgit@trillian.cg.shawcable.net> <4713551B.9040103@genesi-usa.com> <4713D35A.9080200@genesi-usa.com> In-Reply-To: <4713D35A.9080200@genesi-usa.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, domen.puncer@telargo.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Matt Sealey wrote: > call a PSC, we wouldn't be making structures called mpc52xx_programmable_serial_controller, > that's redundant, I don't think calling it "bestcomm" (which is it's name) over > "bcom" (which isn't) works to anyone's advantage here. Disadvantage, even. Damn autocorrecting :( -- Matt Sealey Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations