From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <4713F56E.50002@manicmethod.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:19:10 -0400
From: Joshua Brindle <method@manicmethod.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: russell@coker.com.au
CC: "Christopher J. PeBenito" <cpebenito@tresys.com>,
        Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>, SE-Linux <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>,
        Karl MacMillan <kmacmillan@mentalrootkit.com>
Subject: Re: checkmodule and MLS/MCS support
References: <200710142206.29369.russell@coker.com.au> <1192456623.29203.14.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <1192476945.13098.154.camel@gorn> <200710160827.06055.russell@coker.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <200710160827.06055.russell@coker.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov
List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov

Russell Coker wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 October 2007 05:35, "Christopher J. PeBenito" 
> <cpebenito@tresys.com> wrote:
>   
>> If we're willing to say that non-refpolicy
>> building is a tiny minority/corner case, then this results in
>> practically no gain, since the compiler option is already taken care of
>> by the refpolicy build infrastructure.
>>     
>
> This discussion started when I cited an example of a new SE Linux user who 
> experienced great frustration due to the current mode of operation.
>
> If we have some new users who decide that this is difficult enough that 
> selinux=0 is the solution then solving the problem has some real benefits.
>   

This is pretty extreme, its just a flag.


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.