Re: [Patch][RFC]Split kvm_vcpu to support new archs.

[Avi Kivity <avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>]

Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>   
>> Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
>>     
>>>>> About mmu,  i am not sure about this. IA64 only need kvm module to
>>>>> allocate and free memory for guests. Most functions related to mmu
>>>>> are useless for IA64. If we put them as common, Maybe we have to
>>>>> define some blank functions. 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> I meant the mmu is x86 specific.
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> Sorry for misunderstanding.  Should we move out the code logic
>>> related to mmu from kvm_main.c , and put them as arch-specific code
>>> ?:) 
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> Yes.  But from what I looked, there isn't much mmu code in kvm_main.c,
>> only calls to mmu code.
>>     
>
> I mean this too. Maybe IA64 can define some blank fucntions called in
> kvm_main.c. 
>
>   

You will need mmu_unload(), reload(), etc.  to notify your mmu that the 
host memory map has changed, for example due to memory hotplug.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/