From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, devel@openvz.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] Omit double hash calculations in xxx_frag_intern
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:48:46 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4714C13E.3040808@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4714C0AF.1000209@openvz.org>
Since the hash value is already calculated in xxx_find, we can
simply use it later. This is already done in netfilter code,
so make the same in ipv4 and ipv6.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
---
>From 5bcb464538cf504a9f6cf3be33dbd1a5ff18b693 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pavel <pavel@xemulnb.sw.ru>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:40:30 +0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] Pass the hash value as an extra argument
---
net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c | 11 ++++-------
net/ipv6/reassembly.c | 11 +++++------
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
index 443b3f8..d12a18b 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
@@ -212,17 +212,14 @@ out:
/* Creation primitives. */
-static struct ipq *ip_frag_intern(struct ipq *qp_in)
+static struct ipq *ip_frag_intern(struct ipq *qp_in, unsigned int hash)
{
struct ipq *qp;
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
struct hlist_node *n;
#endif
- unsigned int hash;
write_lock(&ip4_frags.lock);
- hash = ipqhashfn(qp_in->id, qp_in->saddr, qp_in->daddr,
- qp_in->protocol);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/* With SMP race we have to recheck hash table, because
* such entry could be created on other cpu, while we
@@ -257,7 +254,7 @@ static struct ipq *ip_frag_intern(struct ipq *qp_in)
}
/* Add an entry to the 'ipq' queue for a newly received IP datagram. */
-static struct ipq *ip_frag_create(struct iphdr *iph, u32 user)
+static struct ipq *ip_frag_create(struct iphdr *iph, u32 user, unsigned int h)
{
struct ipq *qp;
@@ -278,7 +275,7 @@ static struct ipq *ip_frag_create(struct iphdr *iph, u32 user)
spin_lock_init(&qp->q.lock);
atomic_set(&qp->q.refcnt, 1);
- return ip_frag_intern(qp);
+ return ip_frag_intern(qp, h);
out_nomem:
LIMIT_NETDEBUG(KERN_ERR "ip_frag_create: no memory left !\n");
@@ -313,7 +310,7 @@ static inline struct ipq *ip_find(struct iphdr *iph, u32 user)
}
read_unlock(&ip4_frags.lock);
- return ip_frag_create(iph, user);
+ return ip_frag_create(iph, user, hash);
}
/* Is the fragment too far ahead to be part of ipq? */
diff --git a/net/ipv6/reassembly.c b/net/ipv6/reassembly.c
index 6ad19cf..0a1bf43 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/reassembly.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/reassembly.c
@@ -233,16 +233,15 @@ out:
/* Creation primitives. */
-static struct frag_queue *ip6_frag_intern(struct frag_queue *fq_in)
+static struct frag_queue *ip6_frag_intern(struct frag_queue *fq_in,
+ unsigned int hash)
{
struct frag_queue *fq;
- unsigned int hash;
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
struct hlist_node *n;
#endif
write_lock(&ip6_frags.lock);
- hash = ip6qhashfn(fq_in->id, &fq_in->saddr, &fq_in->daddr);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
hlist_for_each_entry(fq, n, &ip6_frags.hash[hash], q.list) {
if (fq->id == fq_in->id &&
@@ -273,7 +272,7 @@ static struct frag_queue *ip6_frag_intern(struct frag_queue *fq_in)
static struct frag_queue *
ip6_frag_create(__be32 id, struct in6_addr *src, struct in6_addr *dst,
- struct inet6_dev *idev)
+ struct inet6_dev *idev, unsigned int hash)
{
struct frag_queue *fq;
@@ -290,7 +289,7 @@ ip6_frag_create(__be32 id, struct in6_addr *src, struct in6_addr *dst,
spin_lock_init(&fq->q.lock);
atomic_set(&fq->q.refcnt, 1);
- return ip6_frag_intern(fq);
+ return ip6_frag_intern(fq, hash);
oom:
IP6_INC_STATS_BH(idev, IPSTATS_MIB_REASMFAILS);
@@ -318,7 +317,7 @@ fq_find(__be32 id, struct in6_addr *src, struct in6_addr *dst,
}
read_unlock(&ip6_frags.lock);
- return ip6_frag_create(id, src, dst, idev);
+ return ip6_frag_create(id, src, dst, idev, hash);
}
--
1.5.3.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-16 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-16 13:46 [PATCH 0/7] Next step in consolidating the IP fragment management Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-16 13:48 ` Pavel Emelyanov [this message]
2007-10-18 2:44 ` [PATCH 1/7] Omit double hash calculations in xxx_frag_intern David Miller
2007-10-16 13:53 ` [PATCH 2/7] Consolidate xxx_frag_intern Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-18 2:44 ` David Miller
2007-10-16 13:57 ` [PATCH 3/7] Consolidate xxx_frag_alloc() Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-18 2:45 ` David Miller
2007-10-16 14:00 ` [PATCH 4/7] Consolidate xxx_frag_create() Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-18 2:46 ` David Miller
2007-10-16 14:03 ` [PATCH 5/7] Consolidate xxx_find() in fragment management Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-18 2:47 ` David Miller
2007-10-16 14:05 ` [PATCH 6/7] Remove no longer needed ->equal callback Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-18 2:48 ` David Miller
2007-10-16 14:07 ` [PATCH 7/7] Consolidate frag queues freeing Pavel Emelyanov
2007-10-18 2:48 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4714C13E.3040808@openvz.org \
--to=xemul@openvz.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.