From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l9GEL7NO012047 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:21:07 -0400 Received: from carlit.cesca.es (carlit.cesca.es [84.88.0.2]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l9GEL1eD008091 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:21:01 -0400 Received: from carlit.cesca.es (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carlit.cesca.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A549331D70 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:20:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.94.163.17] (santalis.cesca.es [192.94.163.17]) by carlit.cesca.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3D69331D1E for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:20:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4714C8C6.7060204@cesca.es> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:20:54 +0200 From: Jordi Prats MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [linux-lvm] cluster LVM Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: linux-lvm@redhat.com Hi all, I've been googling for a while but I found nothing about the current limitations of CLVM. Someone told me that you must use just one logical volume for each volume group. Is that true? Anyone could tell me witch are and if exists any risks of loosing data by using CLVM given certain configuration? There's anything that it's not safe to use, like snapshots, pvmove...? Many thanks, Jordi