From: Praveen Kumar <kpraveen.lkml@gmail.com>
To: Kushal Kothari <kushalkothari285@gmail.com>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, fabioaiuto83@gmail.com,
ross.schm.dev@gmail.com, hdegoede@redhat.com,
marcocesati@gmail.com, fmdefrancesco@gmail.com,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com, mike.rapoport@gmail.com,
kushalkothari2850@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: core: Refactor nested if-else
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:43:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4715e602-bdc0-e0d9-ff99-8eb08c8c5063@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211025072528.152028-1-kushalkothari285@gmail.com>
On 25-10-2021 12:55, Kushal Kothari wrote:
> Refactor nested if else by combining nested if into a single if condition and removing unnecessary else conditionals which leads to removing unnecessary tabs .There is no change in logic of new code.
> checkpatch warning : Too many leading tabs - consider code refactoring
>
> Signed-off-by: Kushal Kothari <kushalkothari285@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c | 65 ++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
> index 0f82f5031c43..eb10b6f85426 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
> @@ -1192,46 +1192,33 @@ unsigned int OnAssocReq(struct adapter *padapter, union recv_frame *precv_frame)
> p = pframe + WLAN_HDR_A3_LEN + ie_offset; ie_len = 0;
> for (;;) {
> p = rtw_get_ie(p, WLAN_EID_VENDOR_SPECIFIC, &ie_len, pkt_len - WLAN_HDR_A3_LEN - ie_offset);
> - if (p) {
> - if (!memcmp(p+2, WMM_IE, 6)) {
> -
> - pstat->flags |= WLAN_STA_WME;
> -
> - pstat->qos_option = 1;
> - pstat->qos_info = *(p+8);
> -
> - pstat->max_sp_len = (pstat->qos_info>>5)&0x3;
> -
> - if ((pstat->qos_info&0xf) != 0xf)
> - pstat->has_legacy_ac = true;
> - else
> - pstat->has_legacy_ac = false;
> -
> - if (pstat->qos_info&0xf) {
> - if (pstat->qos_info&BIT(0))
> - pstat->uapsd_vo = BIT(0)|BIT(1);
> - else
> - pstat->uapsd_vo = 0;
> -
> - if (pstat->qos_info&BIT(1))
> - pstat->uapsd_vi = BIT(0)|BIT(1);
> - else
> - pstat->uapsd_vi = 0;
> -
> - if (pstat->qos_info&BIT(2))
> - pstat->uapsd_bk = BIT(0)|BIT(1);
> - else
> - pstat->uapsd_bk = 0;
> -
> - if (pstat->qos_info&BIT(3))
> - pstat->uapsd_be = BIT(0)|BIT(1);
> - else
> - pstat->uapsd_be = 0;
> -
> - }
> -
> - break;
> + if (p && !memcmp(p+2, WMM_IE, 6)) {
> + pstat->flags |= WLAN_STA_WME;
> + pstat->qos_option = 1;
> + pstat->qos_info = *(p+8);
> + pstat->max_sp_len = (pstat->qos_info>>5)&0x3;
> + pstat->has_legacy_ac = false;
> + if ((pstat->qos_info&0xf) != 0xf)
> + pstat->has_legacy_ac = true;
> +
> + pstat->uapsd_vo = 0;
> + if (pstat->qos_info&0xf) {
> + if (pstat->qos_info&BIT(0))
> + pstat->uapsd_vo = BIT(0)|BIT(1);
> +
> + pstat->uapsd_vi = 0;
> + if (pstat->qos_info&BIT(1))
> + pstat->uapsd_vi = BIT(0)|BIT(1);
> +
> + pstat->uapsd_bk = 0;
> + if (pstat->qos_info&BIT(2))
> + pstat->uapsd_bk = BIT(0)|BIT(1);
> +
> + pstat->uapsd_be = 0;
> + if (pstat->qos_info&BIT(3))
> + pstat->uapsd_be = BIT(0)|BIT(1);
> }
> + break;
> } else {
> break;
> }
there is a bug here, if *p* is not null, and *memcmp* failed; then we fall in else part and break, and will miss the next entry in *p* using below statement
p = p + ie_len + 2;
>
Regards,
~Praveen.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-25 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-25 7:25 [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: core: Refactor nested if-else Kushal Kothari
2021-10-25 7:33 ` Greg KH
2021-10-25 7:56 ` kushal kothari
2021-10-25 10:02 ` Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-10-26 14:02 ` kushal kothari
2021-10-25 9:13 ` Praveen Kumar [this message]
2021-10-26 13:51 ` [Outreachy kernel] " kushal kothari
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4715e602-bdc0-e0d9-ff99-8eb08c8c5063@gmail.com \
--to=kpraveen.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=fabioaiuto83@gmail.com \
--cc=fmdefrancesco@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=kushalkothari2850@gmail.com \
--cc=kushalkothari285@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=marcocesati@gmail.com \
--cc=mike.rapoport@gmail.com \
--cc=outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com \
--cc=ross.schm.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.