From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <47162E66.1080406@domain.hid> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:46:46 +0200 From: "CHABAL David" MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4705ED3B.4070600@domain.hid> <2ff1a98a0710050130j7e0db84dq838aab0417c8bd3f@domain.hid> <4705FE04.7000909@domain.hid> <1191576011.20623.114.camel@domain.hid> <470611FA.30103@domain.hid> <1191592977.20623.142.camel@domain.hid> <470A26BC.506@domain.hid> <1192015852.22917.197.camel@domain.hid> <470F7F2E.3020206@domain.hid> <470F82FF.9020701@domain.hid> <1192203284.6499.135.camel@domain.hid> <470F978B.1000005@domain.hid> <1192207431.6499.161.camel@domain.hid> <4715C70F.4040501@domain.hid> <1192610471.5973.4.camel@domain.hid> <4715CE15.10202@domain.hid> <1192612658.5973.11.camel@domain.hid> <47160AD3.4090109@domain.hid> <1192628763.5973.16.camel@domain.hid> <471621C8.9070006@domain.hid> <1192634673.5973.33.camel@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <1192634673.5973.33.camel@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] awful latencies (~110us) List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: rpm@xenomai.org Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org Philippe Gerum a =E9crit : > On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 16:52 +0200, CHABAL David wrote: >>> Grmmff... I think the PIC on this box has some deep troubles; please = try >>> this patch, in replacement of the previous ipipe_trace_special >>> instrumentation: >>> >> >> RTD| 8.348| 10.387| 43.647| 0| 6.098|=20 >> 80.440 >> ---|------------|------------|------------|--------|------------------= ------- >> RTS| 6.098| 10.020| 80.440| 0| 00:17:20/00:17= :20 >> [root@domain.hid bin]# >> >> >> IRQ handling takes 17=B5s in the worst case. >> >> It takes a long time to write 3 poor bytes... >> >=20 > Indeed. Each outb to the ISA bus should be somewhere in the 1-2.5 us > range depending on the hw, maybe a bit higher in case of contention, bu= t > not that much. >=20 >> May be is it a SMI problem ??? (Globally disable SMI is on) >> >=20 > It's less likely with an ICH-2 chipset. >=20 > I see that CONFIG_IDEDMA_PCI_AUTO is disabled. Any reason not to use PC= I > DMA when available for IDE drives with your hw? >=20 I read this about DMA: http://www.rtai.dk/cgi-bin/gratiswiki.pl?DMA_And_Jitter but I'm not sure if I understood well. David