From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-net@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFD] iptables: mangle table obsoletes filter table
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:24:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <471699A0.3060303@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47168EA1.1080300@tmr.com>
Bill Davidsen wrote:
>>>> If not, then shouldn't the filter table be obsoleted to avoid
>>>> confusion?
>>> That would probably confuse people. Just don't use it if you don't
>>> need to.
>>
> That is a most practical suggestion.
>
>> The problem is that people think they are safe with the filter table,
>> when in fact they need the prerouting chain to seal things. Right now
>> this is only possible in the mangle table.
>>
> I'm not sure what you think is unsafe about using the filter table, and
> the order of evaluation issues certainly seem to suggest that some
> actions would take a major rethink at least. Perhaps you could avoid
> breaking all of the setups which currently work, rather than force
> everyone to do things differently because you feel that your way is better.
>
It was my intention to suggest that unintentional breakage of existing
setups should be avoided, not that removing the filter table was some
evil plot. ;-)
On rereading my original post I failed to make that clear, please take
it as intended.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-17 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-11 21:31 [RFD] iptables: mangle table obsoletes filter table Al Boldi
2007-10-12 4:35 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-12 4:39 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-12 5:37 ` Al Boldi
2007-10-12 11:48 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-12 12:25 ` Al Boldi
2007-10-12 12:31 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-12 13:18 ` Al Boldi
2007-10-12 13:23 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-12 22:56 ` Al Boldi
2007-10-17 22:37 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-17 23:24 ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
2007-10-20 3:40 ` Al Boldi
2007-10-20 4:47 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-10-20 11:10 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-21 4:31 ` Al Boldi
2007-10-21 4:53 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-10-23 22:27 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-12 13:01 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-12 13:30 ` Al Boldi
2007-10-12 13:39 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-12 13:48 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-12 14:02 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-12 14:03 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-12 22:56 ` Al Boldi
2007-10-12 23:02 ` Patrick McHardy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-10-12 5:14 Al Boldi
2007-10-18 15:41 ` Matthew Faulkner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=471699A0.3060303@tmr.com \
--to=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=a1426z@gawab.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.