All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
To: John Sigler <linux.kernel@free.fr>
Cc: Martin Mares <mj@ucw.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: Understanding lspci output
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:37:03 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47169C9F.9040809@shaw.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa.FcCntqDHRe76qrRi4OjUjOq2ak4@ifi.uio.no>

John Sigler wrote:
>>> 4. Does the system have a PCI-X bus?
>>
>> Yes, the devices on bus 01 are PCI-X devices, so there is a PCI-X bus.
> 
> I thought PCI-X devices could operate on a PCI bus? If that is true, 
> then the presence of a PCI-X device would not necessarily imply the 
> presence of a PCI-X bus, right?
> 
> There are no external PCI-X slots in the system, only 2 PCI slots.
> The 4 NICs are integrated to the motherboard.
> http://advantech.com/products/1U-Rackmount-Intel-Pentium-4Processor-based-Platform-with-4PCI-LAN-Ports-2-PCI-Expansion-Slots/mod_1-23A2W4.aspx 

The NICs are all PCI-X devices and they report "64bit+" so they will be 
running on a PCI-X bus internally.

> 
> 
>>> 2. Do any of the PCI buses support 66 MHz operation?
>>
>> Yes, PCI-X does.
> 
> So the 01:0f.0 device (Multimedia video controller) is on the same bus 
> as the 4 PCI-X devices and will have to share the bus bandwidth?
> 
> Does 66MHz+ in the Status line means this device is running at 66 MHz?

I believe so.

> 
>>> 3. Do any of the PCI slots support 64-bit data path?
>>
>> This cannot be inferred from the lspci output -- there is no way how to
>> tell if a bus has physical slots or it exists only internally.
> 
> Can I use lspci to see whether a specific PCI device is using a 64-bit 
> data path? (e.g. the 01:0f.0 device)

The "Multimedia video controller: DekTec Digital Video B.V. DTA-105" 
doesn't report PCI-X capabilities. And looking at the card on their web 
site, it does not have a 64-bit extension, so it doesn't support 64-bit.

-- 
Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/


       reply	other threads:[~2007-10-17 23:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <fa.l0Y1Suv/oOMZej6qugSY8HCfo78@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.5QGRWM6v1/dwLaQe8D1zMU1KZeM@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]   ` <fa.FcCntqDHRe76qrRi4OjUjOq2ak4@ifi.uio.no>
2007-10-17 23:37     ` Robert Hancock [this message]
2007-10-17  9:08 Understanding lspci output John Sigler
2007-10-17 11:07 ` Martin Mares
2007-10-17 11:57   ` John Sigler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47169C9F.9040809@shaw.ca \
    --to=hancockr@shaw.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
    --cc=linux.kernel@free.fr \
    --cc=mj@ucw.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.