From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [130.89.2.8] (helo=smtp.utwente.nl) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IiVm9-0001ed-UK for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:51:07 +0200 Received: from Powerbook-2.local (dominion.kabel.utwente.nl [130.89.193.158]) by smtp.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l9IDiCUo018653 for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:44:12 +0200 Message-ID: <47176330.2000200@student.utwente.nl> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:44:16 +0200 From: Koen Kooi User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org References: <4510693243.20071017152524@vanille-media.de> <471729ED.9080208@student.utwente.nl> <1192708743.6158.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1192708743.6158.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.3 X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact helpdesk@ITBE.utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: k.kooi@student.utwente.nl X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: Cleaning up SDK/Toolchain X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 13:51:21 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 13:51:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Richard Purdie schreef: > On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 11:39 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: >> Apart from the libc flaw I pointed out in another mail, the naming of the toolchains is >> broken as well: >> >> angstrom-2007.9-test-20071017-arm-linux-gnueabi-toolchain.tar.bz2 >> angstrom-2007.9-test-20071017-arm-linux-uclibcgnueabi-toolchain.tar.bz2 >> angstrom-2007.9-test-20071018-powerpc-linux-toolchain.tar.bz2 >> angstrom-2007.9-test-20071018-powerpc-linux-uclibc-toolchain.tar.bz2 >> >> There's no way to see if the arm ones are armv4t, armv5te or armv6 and the powerpc ones >> ppc405, ppc440 or ppc603e. For compiling 'hello world' that doesn't matter, but libc6.so >> and libgcc_s.so will contain instruction not available on other cpus of that arch (e.g. >> clz is not in armv4t), so your binary will probably not work on your device. >> >> My idea is to use PACKAGE_ARCH (e.g. armv5te or ppc603e) instead of TARGET_ARCH. >> >> Comments/hints/ideas? > > We actually have a bigger problem. Staging uses an arm directory, not an > armv5te one so the armv5te binaries mix up with the armv4 ones etc. > > This isn't a problem with images built from packages where everything > dynamically links since the right packages are used. The moment someone > tries to statically link an armv4 binary with armv5te in staging, game > over though. > > So both the meta-toolchain and staging need some thought (and are > related since meta-toolchain has knowledge to rebuild bits of staging > for use in its "shortcut an OE build by skipping the toolchain" mode. > > I agreed we probably need to add in some PACKAGE_ARCHs in places but its > yet another thing that needs some careful thought and we'll probably > break people's existing builds. I hope to look at/think about it soon if > nobody beats me too it... Can't we put it in at the same time as the staging /usr changes? We'll be breaking stuff anyway... regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFHF2MwMkyGM64RGpERAkTbAJoDh5qic4QmFPw7N857kQm0rDabjgCgtcJ0 hqYD4JywIUYGwPtw8dgJnTM= =Hlfq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----