From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from imap.sh.mvista.com (unknown [63.81.120.155]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8325DDEE0 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:18:24 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <47176B39.1070300@ru.mvista.com> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 18:18:33 +0400 From: Sergei Shtylyov MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] Implement {read,update}_persistent_clock. References: <1190345162.620000.305760830507.qpush@thor> <47162B6F.40903@ru.mvista.com> In-Reply-To: <47162B6F.40903@ru.mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Thomas Gleixner , Paul Mackerras , Realtime Kernel List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hello, I wrote: >>With these functions implemented we cooperate better with the generic >>timekeeping code. This obsoletes the need for the timer sysdev as a bonus. > Aha, I'm seeing it's not merged to mainline yet! Contrarywise, it's been merged first -- looks like this all happened because of me not commenting on the patches in time... :-( Now one can only send incremental patches... sigh... WBR, Sergei From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] Implement {read,update}_persistent_clock. Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 18:18:33 +0400 Message-ID: <47176B39.1070300@ru.mvista.com> References: <1190345162.620000.305760830507.qpush@thor> <47162B6F.40903@ru.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Tony Breeds , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Thomas Gleixner , Paul Mackerras , Realtime Kernel To: Sergei Shtylyov Return-path: Received: from h155.mvista.com ([63.81.120.155]:43394 "EHLO imap.sh.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933857AbXJROSW (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:18:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <47162B6F.40903@ru.mvista.com> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org Hello, I wrote: >>With these functions implemented we cooperate better with the generic >>timekeeping code. This obsoletes the need for the timer sysdev as a bonus. > Aha, I'm seeing it's not merged to mainline yet! Contrarywise, it's been merged first -- looks like this all happened because of me not commenting on the patches in time... :-( Now one can only send incremental patches... sigh... WBR, Sergei