From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4717D535.3010709@domain.hid> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 23:50:45 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <200710182116.25461.paul_c@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <200710182116.25461.paul_c@domain.hid> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig84CEDAFE67D49F0C739A5565" Sender: jan.kiszka@domain.hid Subject: Re: [Adeos-main] 2.6.23 x86_64 broken for SMP ? List-Id: General discussion about Adeos List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Cc: adeos-main@gna.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig84CEDAFE67D49F0C739A5565 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Paul wrote: > Attempting to compile on x86_64 with SMP enabled, getting quite a few f= ailures=20 > cetered around ipipe_declare_cpuid being undeclared in=20 > arch/x86_64/kernel/ipipe.c. Should we be including ipipe_compat.h or=20 > following the lead set in arch/i386/kernel/ipipe.c ? Nope, we should rather remove the obsolete code from the ipipe core. You could simply kill ipipe_declare_cpuid and replace the cpuid spots with ipipe_processor_id() (compare to latest i386 ipipe). Cleanup patches always welcome! Jan --------------enig84CEDAFE67D49F0C739A5565 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHF9U4niDOoMHTA+kRAloqAJ4kFL08QaTCUe8E3+OkVkaCn9d95ACfbCn2 wCNX7gCKugZIq4q5XMQuruA= =ubYk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig84CEDAFE67D49F0C739A5565--