From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Denis V. Lunev" Subject: Re: [PATCH] [NETNS49] support for per/namespace routing cache cleanup Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:53:08 +0400 Message-ID: <47187074.3090206@sw.ru> References: <20071017111215.GA29653@iris.sw.ru> <4715F60F.6060304@fr.ibm.com> <4716055D.4010102@sw.ru> <471610E8.8020008@fr.ibm.com> <471617CA.9090901@sw.ru> <471624C0.9020108@fr.ibm.com> <47164CBD.3040107@gmail.com> <471708D8.3080808@bull.net> <471772EB.2060206@sw.ru> <47185F2C.1070404@fr.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <47185F2C.1070404-NmTC/0ZBporQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Daniel Lezcano Cc: Linux Containers , "Denis V. Lunev" , ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, Benjamin Thery List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Daniel Lezcano wrote: > So you prefer to have multiple timers flushing a portion of a shared > routing cache ? > > It is not impossible I already tryed that for ipv6. it will just touch > much more files. > > If we want, at all costs, to have the routing cache flushed per > namespace, I am much more favorable to have a timer per namespace than > using the algorithm you sent previously. as do I. But the IPv4 and IPv6 situation is much different. IPv6 cache is separated while IPv4 one is common. So, the situation is not uniform, at least :( By the way, we can move routing cache into the FIB tree like one for IPv4 :)