All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "BERTRAND Joël" <joel.bertrand@systella.fr>
To: blackmagic02881@gmail.com
Cc: iscsitarget-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Abort Task ?
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:30:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4718BF6A.6080905@systella.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1192802144.3593.2.camel@dhcp-117.ibrix.com>

Ming Zhang wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 09:48 +0200, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
>> Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
>>> BERTRAND Joël wrote:
>>>> BERTRAND Joël wrote:
>>>>>     I can format serveral times (mkfs.ext3) a 1.5 TB volume 
>>>> over iSCSI 
>>>>> without any trouble. I can read and write on this virtual 
>>>> disk without 
>>>>> any trouble.
>>>>>
>>>>>     Now, I have configured ietd with :
>>>>>
>>>>> Lun 0 Sectors=1464725758,Type=nullio
>>>>>
>>>>> and I run on initiator side :
>>>>>
>>>>> Root gershwin:[/dev] > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdj bs=8192
>>>>> 479482+0 records in
>>>>> 479482+0 records out
>>>>> 3927916544 bytes (3.9 GB) copied, 153.222 seconds, 25.6 MB/s
>>>>>
>>>>> Root gershwin:[/dev] > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdj bs=8192
>>>>>
>>>>>     I'm waitinfor a crash. No one when I write these lines. 
>>>>    I suspect 
>>>>> an interaction between raid and iscsi.
>>>> 	I simultanely run :
>>>>
>>>> Root gershwin:[/dev] > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdj bs=8192
>>>> 8397210+0 records in
>>>> 8397210+0 records out
>>>> 68789944320 bytes (69 GB) copied, 2732.55 seconds, 25.2 MB/s
>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>> Root gershwin:[~] > dd if=/dev/sdj of=/dev/null bs=8192
>>>> 739200+0 records in
>>>> 739199+0 records out
>>>> 6055518208 bytes (6.1 GB) copied, 447.178 seconds, 13.5 MB/s
>>>>
>>>> 	without any trouble.
>>> The speed can definitely be improved. Look at your network setup
>>> and use ping to try and get the network latency to a minimum.
>>>
>>> # ping -A -s 8192 172.16.24.140
>>> ....
>>> --- 172.16.24.140 ping statistics ---
>>> 14058 packets transmitted, 14057 received, 0% packet loss, time 9988ms
>>> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.234/0.268/2.084/0.041 ms, ipg/ewma 0.710/0.260 ms
>> gershwin:[~] > ping -A -s 8192 192.168.0.2
>> PING 192.168.0.2 (192.168.0.2) 8192(8220) bytes of data.
>> 8200 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.693 ms
>> 8200 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.595 ms
>> 8200 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.583 ms
>> 8200 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.589 ms
>> 8200 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.580 ms
>> 8200 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.594 ms
>> 8200 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.580 ms
>> 8200 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.592 ms
>> 8200 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=0.589 ms
>> 8200 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=0.571 ms
>> 8200 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=0.588 ms
>> 8200 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=0.580 ms
>> 8200 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=0.587 ms
>>
>> --- 192.168.0.2 ping statistics ---
>> 13 packets transmitted, 13 received, 0% packet loss, time 2400ms
>> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.571/0.593/0.693/0.044 ms, ipg/ewma 200.022/0.607 ms
>> gershwin:[~] >
>>
>> 	Both initiator and target are alone on a gigabit NIC (Tigon3). On 
>> target server, istd1 takes 100% of a CPU (and only one CPU, even my 
>> T1000 can simultaneous run 32 threads). I think the limitation comes 
>> from istd1.
> 
> usually istdx will not take 100% cpu with 1G network, especially when
> using disk as back storage, some kind of profiling work might be helpful
> to tell what happened...
> 
> forgot to ask, your sparc64 platform cpu spec.

Root gershwin:[/mnt/solaris] > cat /proc/cpuinfo
cpu             : UltraSparc T1 (Niagara)
fpu             : UltraSparc T1 integrated FPU
prom            : OBP 4.23.4 2006/08/04 20:45
type            : sun4v
ncpus probed    : 24
ncpus active    : 24
D$ parity tl1   : 0
I$ parity tl1   : 0

	Both servers are built with 1 GHz T1 processors (6 cores, 24 threads).

	Regards,

	JKB

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Iscsitarget-devel mailing list
Iscsitarget-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iscsitarget-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-19 14:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <471720F1.40409@systella.fr>
     [not found] ` <471727F3.2080500@systella.fr>
     [not found]   ` <471734C5.8090405@systella.fr>
     [not found]     ` <E2BB8074E5500C42984D980D4BD78EF9017A2958@MFG-NYC-EXCH2.mfg.prv>
     [not found]       ` <1192721909.3596.15.camel@dhcp-117.ibrix.com>
2007-10-18 16:33         ` Abort Task ? BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-18 17:14           ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-18 21:03             ` Ross S. W. Walker
2007-10-18 21:35               ` [Iscsitarget-devel] " Ming Zhang
2007-10-19  7:48               ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-19 13:55                 ` Ming Zhang
2007-10-19 14:30                   ` BERTRAND Joël [this message]
2007-10-19 14:37                     ` Ming Zhang
2007-10-19 14:47                       ` BERTRAND Joël
2007-10-19 14:53                         ` Ming Zhang
2007-10-19 14:51                       ` [Iscsitarget-devel] " Ross S. W. Walker
2007-10-18 17:30           ` Ming Zhang
2007-10-19 12:25 Ross S. W. Walker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4718BF6A.6080905@systella.fr \
    --to=joel.bertrand@systella.fr \
    --cc=blackmagic02881@gmail.com \
    --cc=iscsitarget-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.