From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1Ija63-0005E0-9W for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 08:39:59 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ija62-0005Dj-8X for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 08:39:58 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ija60-0005D4-QJ for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 08:39:57 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ija60-0005Cz-MJ for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 08:39:56 -0400 Received: from pne-smtpout4-sn2.hy.skanova.net ([81.228.8.154]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ija60-00020m-8x for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 08:39:56 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (88.193.32.97) by pne-smtpout4-sn2.hy.skanova.net (7.3.129) id 471A7B0C00003BB7 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:39:52 +0200 Message-ID: <471B48A3.8060206@nic.fi> Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 15:40:03 +0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Vesa_J=E4=E4skel=E4inen?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <20071019210222.GA25328@thorin> <87abqcrcij.fsf@xs4all.nl> <20071021122702.GB2868@thorin> In-Reply-To: <20071021122702.GB2868@thorin> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) Subject: Re: [PATCH] TODO X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:39:58 -0000 Robert Millan wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 12:24:36PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote: >> Robert Millan writes: >> >>> It seems the TODO is horribly outdated, so I gave it a review. I think these >>> are already fixed. Is it correct? >> You are right, this file is outdated. Many things have been >> implemented already. Now we use the TODO on the wiki, which is also >> outdated. > > Should the TODO in CVS be updated with my patch, or removed altogether? > Perhaps add reference to Wiki page. And update Wiki ;)