From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans de Goede Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:37:05 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] ABIT IP35 Pro mainboard wrong values from 'sensors' Message-Id: <471B5601.7060904@hhs.nl> List-Id: References: <1192816904.8203.11.camel@homedev.skoona.net> In-Reply-To: <1192816904.8203.11.camel@homedev.skoona.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org JAMES SCOTT wrote: >=20 > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Jean Delvare > To: James Scott Jr > Cc: Hans de Goede ; lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org > Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2007 4:49:01 PM > Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] ABIT IP35 Pro mainboard wrong values from 'sens= ors' >=20 > On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 22:53:09 -0400, James Scott Jr wrote: >> Thank you, sensor's output is now correct - coretemp's is wacked. I >> will look into whats happening with coretemp, later. >> >> [jscott@vserv ~]$ sensors >> (...) >> coretemp-isa-0000 >> Adapter: ISA adapter >> Core 0: +54=B0C (high =3D +100=B0C) =20 >> >> coretemp-isa-0001 >> Adapter: ISA adapter >> Core 1: +51=B0C (high =3D +100=B0C) =20 >> >> coretemp-isa-0002 >> Adapter: ISA adapter >> Core 2: +52=B0C (high =3D +100=B0C) =20 >> >> coretemp-isa-0003 >> Adapter: ISA adapter >> Core 3: +50=B0C (high =3D +100=B0C) =20 >> >=20 > The coretemp values actually look alright to me. >=20 > Jean; The abituguru3... sensors output showed 'CPU 40c' and coretemp... d= etails the same CPU around '50c'. So, I have output, it is formatted corre= ctly. However, I believe the reported value is wrong. 10c is a huge diffe= rence in values - which is correct? All Cores are running Folding@Home at = 100%, so this is a load temp and would not be available if I rebooted to bi= os to verify. >=20 > I did not find the coretemp-isa-* in the sensors.conf file. Do you know = where the computes for this module are setup? James, For some reason later versions of the uguru (and earlier versions too after= a=20 BIOS update) seem to report much too low CPU temp values. I guess they are = reporting the actual sensor value and adding some offset to compensate for = the=20 distance between the sensor on the motherboard and the actual CPU. So I think the core temp readings are correct, esp. for a loaded system. Regards, Hans _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors