All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: dean gaudet <dean@arctic.org>
Cc: "Nick Piggin" <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
	"David Chinner" <dgc@sgi.com>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com, Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Mark Williamson" <mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk>,
	"Morten Bøgeskov" <xen-users@morten.bogeskov.dk>,
	xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:34:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <471C1A61.1010001@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.0.9999.0710212015430.2320@twinlark.arctic.org>

dean gaudet wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
>   
>> Yes, as Dave said, vmap (more specifically: vunmap) is very expensive
>> because it generally has to invalidate TLBs on all CPUs.
>>     
>
> why is that?  ignoring 32-bit archs we have heaps of address space 
> available... couldn't the kernel just burn address space and delay global 
> TLB invalidate by some relatively long time (say 1 second)?
>   

Yes, that's precisely the problem.  xfs does delay the unmap, leaving
stray mappings, which upsets Xen.

    J

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-22  3:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-12 16:58 Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-12 17:08 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-14 22:56 ` David Chinner
2007-10-14 23:12   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-14 23:33     ` David Chinner
2007-10-15  4:15     ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-15  0:57       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-15  7:26         ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-15  3:42           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-15  4:11             ` David Chinner
2007-10-15  4:18               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-15  4:25                 ` David Chinner
2007-10-15  8:31                   ` [xfs-masters] " Christoph Hellwig
2007-10-22  3:18       ` dean gaudet
2007-10-22  3:34         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2007-10-22  4:28           ` dean gaudet
2007-10-22  4:39             ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-22 18:37               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-22 18:32             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-22 13:47           ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-22 18:40             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-22 19:07               ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-22 19:11                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-22 22:32                 ` David Chinner
2007-10-22 23:35                   ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-23  0:16                     ` Zachary Amsden
2007-10-23  0:36                     ` David Chinner
2007-10-23  7:04                       ` [patch] " David Chinner
2007-10-23  9:30                         ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-23 12:41                           ` David Chinner
2007-10-23 14:33                             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-24  4:36                           ` [PATCH] Allow lazy unmapping by taking extra page references V2 David Chinner
2007-10-24  5:08                             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-24 21:48                               ` [PATCH] Allow lazy unmapping by taking extra page references V3 David Chinner
2007-10-24 22:46                                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-24 23:21                                   ` David Chinner
2007-10-23  9:28                       ` Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings Andi Kleen
2007-10-15  9:36   ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-15 14:56     ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-15 11:07       ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-15 11:28         ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-15 12:54           ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-21 12:17             ` Dave Airlie
2007-10-21 22:16         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-22  9:49           ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=471C1A61.1010001@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=dean@arctic.org \
    --cc=dgc@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    --cc=xen-users@morten.bogeskov.dk \
    --cc=xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.