From: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] ipmi_demangle_device_id(): remove dead code
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 22:58:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <471C1FC9.1070705@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071022024814.GL30533@stusta.de>
Yes, it's a problem, but wrong fix. Thanks, I'll send a patch for it.
-corey
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch removes obviously dead code spotted by the Coverity checker.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
>
> ---
>
> include/linux/ipmi_smi.h | 10 ++--------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> --- linux-2.6/include/linux/ipmi_smi.h.old 2007-10-21 23:03:03.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/ipmi_smi.h 2007-10-21 23:05:59.000000000 +0200
> @@ -158,44 +158,38 @@ static inline int ipmi_demangle_device_i
> if (data_len < 9)
> return -EINVAL;
> if (data[0] != IPMI_NETFN_APP_RESPONSE << 2 ||
> data[1] != IPMI_GET_DEVICE_ID_CMD)
> /* Strange, didn't get the response we expected. */
> return -EINVAL;
> if (data[2] != 0)
> /* That's odd, it shouldn't be able to fail. */
> return -EINVAL;
>
> data += 3;
> data_len -= 3;
> id->device_id = data[0];
> id->device_revision = data[1];
> id->firmware_revision_1 = data[2];
> id->firmware_revision_2 = data[3];
> id->ipmi_version = data[4];
> id->additional_device_support = data[5];
> - if (data_len >= 6) {
> - id->manufacturer_id = (data[6] | (data[7] << 8) |
> - (data[8] << 16));
> - id->product_id = data[9] | (data[10] << 8);
> - } else {
> - id->manufacturer_id = 0;
> - id->product_id = 0;
> - }
> + id->manufacturer_id = (data[6] | (data[7] << 8) | (data[8] << 16));
> + id->product_id = data[9] | (data[10] << 8);
> if (data_len >= 15) {
> memcpy(id->aux_firmware_revision, data+11, 4);
> id->aux_firmware_revision_set = 1;
> } else
> id->aux_firmware_revision_set = 0;
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> /* Add a low-level interface to the IPMI driver. Note that if the
> interface doesn't know its slave address, it should pass in zero.
> The low-level interface should not deliver any messages to the
> upper layer until the start_processing() function in the handlers
> is called, and the lower layer must get the interface from that
> call. */
> int ipmi_register_smi(struct ipmi_smi_handlers *handlers,
> void *send_info,
> struct ipmi_device_id *device_id,
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-22 3:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-22 2:48 [2.6 patch] ipmi_demangle_device_id(): remove dead code Adrian Bunk
2007-10-22 3:58 ` Corey Minyard [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=471C1FC9.1070705@mvista.com \
--to=cminyard@mvista.com \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.