Re: [PATCH] Split kvm_vcpu to support new archs (V2)

[Avi Kivity <avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>]

Carsten Otte wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>   
>> While both PPC and x86 may be able to use it, I doubt there will 
>> actually be common code that ever touches it.
>>     
> Common code could figure whether or not it needs to save/restore the 
> fpu register set, and call back to an arch specific callback to do so. 
> On the other hand, your argument is hard to disprove without actual 
> portability split of the code that works with the data structures.
>
>   

Let's not worry about it now.  There are lots of low-hanging fruit on 
the portability tree, let's pick those first.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/