* [LARTC] bridge or vlan
@ 2007-10-20 11:23 Vaidas M
2007-10-20 11:58 ` Pan'ko Alexander
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vaidas M @ 2007-10-20 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 539 bytes --]
Hello to everyone,
Here is the situation:
[LAN1]---[eth3]/----------\
| LinuxBR |[eth2]---[LAN0]---[linuxGW]---[internet]
[LAN2]---[eth4]\----------/
Whole LAN is in subnet 10.0.0.0/24.
So I need:
LAN0, LAN1, LAN2 could not see each other.
LAN0, LAN1, LAN2 is in same subnet (10.0.0.0/24).
All LANs have to get only internet.
How can I configure LinuxBR to do so?
Do I have to do only bridge? Or only vlan? Or both?
Thanks.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ ___ ____ _____
Vaidas M. [Noxius]
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4299 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 143 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [LARTC] bridge or vlan
2007-10-20 11:23 [LARTC] bridge or vlan Vaidas M
@ 2007-10-20 11:58 ` Pan'ko Alexander
2007-10-22 19:05 ` Grant Taylor
2007-10-22 22:34 ` Grant Taylor
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pan'ko Alexander @ 2007-10-20 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 14:23:12 +0300
"Vaidas M" <admin@vdx.lt> wrote:
> Hello to everyone,
>
>
>
> Here is the situation:
>
> [LAN1]---[eth3]/----------\
>
> | LinuxBR |[eth2]---[LAN0]---[linuxGW]---[internet]
>
> [LAN2]---[eth4]\----------/
>
> Whole LAN is in subnet 10.0.0.0/24.
>
>
>
> So I need:
>
> LAN0, LAN1, LAN2 could not see each other.
>
> LAN0, LAN1, LAN2 is in same subnet (10.0.0.0/24).
>
> All LANs have to get only internet.
>
>
>
> How can I configure LinuxBR to do so?
>
> Do I have to do only bridge? Or only vlan? Or both?
>
On LinuxBR:
iptables -A FORWARD -s 10.0.0.0/24 -d linuxGW_IP/32 -j ACCEPT
iptables -A FORWARD -s 10.0.0.0/24 -d 10.0.0.0/24 -j DROP
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 10.0.0.0/24 -d linuxGW_IP/32 -j MASQUERADE
On linuxGW:
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s LinuxBR_IP/32 -j MASQUERADE
--
With best regards, Pan'ko Alexander.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] bridge or vlan
2007-10-20 11:23 [LARTC] bridge or vlan Vaidas M
2007-10-20 11:58 ` Pan'ko Alexander
@ 2007-10-22 19:05 ` Grant Taylor
2007-10-22 22:34 ` Grant Taylor
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Grant Taylor @ 2007-10-22 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On 10/20/07 06:23, Vaidas M wrote:
> Hello to everyone,
>
> Here is the situation:
>
> [LAN1]---[eth3]/----------\
> | LinuxBR |[eth2]---[LAN0]---[linuxGW]---[internet]
> [LAN2]---[eth4]\----------/
>
> Whole LAN is in subnet 10.0.0.0/24.
>
> So I need:
>
> LAN0, LAN1, LAN2 could not see each other.
> LAN0, LAN1, LAN2 is in same subnet (10.0.0.0/24).
>
> All LANs have to get only internet.
>
> How can I configure LinuxBR to do so?
>
> Do I have to do only bridge? Or only vlan? Or both?
This is very simple to do. Bridge all your LANs together (what ever
interface you choose to use, physical and / or VLAN) and use EBTables to
block forwarding of any traffic that has a source and destination on
your 10.0.0.0/24 network. This will allow traffic from the LAN to the
world and from the world to the LAN to be bridged, but not allow LAN to
LAN traffic to be bridged.
ebtables -t filter -A FORWARD --ip-src 10/24 --ip-dst 10/24 -j DROP
This will block all IP traffic. Broadcasts and ARPs will get through,
but can be stopped if you do want. If you do want broadcasts and ARPs
to be stopped let me know and I'll propose some follow up rules to add
to the above to stop them.
Grant. . . .
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] bridge or vlan
2007-10-20 11:23 [LARTC] bridge or vlan Vaidas M
2007-10-20 11:58 ` Pan'ko Alexander
2007-10-22 19:05 ` Grant Taylor
@ 2007-10-22 22:34 ` Grant Taylor
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Grant Taylor @ 2007-10-22 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On 10/22/07 15:50, Vaidas M wrote:
> Thanks for your answer, this would help.
You are welcome.
> I think I know how to block arp: -p ARP -j DROP something like that,
> ant the broadcasts: --pkttype-type ...
Be careful blocking all ARP / broadcasts. Remember that equipment will
need to ARP to find the router, at least from the two LANs that are not
common with the router.
You will probably want to allow ARPs to the router's IP address (and any
other common equipment) and block all others.
Grant. . . .
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-10-22 22:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-10-20 11:23 [LARTC] bridge or vlan Vaidas M
2007-10-20 11:58 ` Pan'ko Alexander
2007-10-22 19:05 ` Grant Taylor
2007-10-22 22:34 ` Grant Taylor
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.