From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ik7gA-0003WS-7l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:31:30 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ik7g3-0003W7-Ni for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:31:28 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ik7g3-0003W4-GI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:31:23 -0400 Received: from eth6155.nsw.adsl.internode.on.net ([59.167.247.10] helo=sac.g2microsystems.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ik7g2-00013i-NV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:31:23 -0400 Received: from [10.1.2.66] (badge.au.g2.internal [10.1.2.66]) by sac.g2microsystems.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l9N0VF77005408 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 10:31:15 +1000 Message-ID: <471D40D6.30405@shaddybaddah.name> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 10:31:18 +1000 From: Shaddy Baddah MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Physical hard disk drive for win32 References: <001d01c6df8e$2de302c0$0464a8c0@athlon> <7fac565a0609240214u5eca5cedka8a023ab562a87f7@mail.gmail.com> <002501c6dfd2$5e5ae820$0464a8c0@athlon> <47190FA7.80108@mail.berlios.de> <219e947f0710220433l1d652092kd238d6ccb8aeb95a@mail.gmail.com> <471CEB10.9030600@mail.berlios.de> In-Reply-To: <471CEB10.9030600@mail.berlios.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, Stefan Weil wrote: > longer than MS does? It would make things easier if we > dropped support for W2K hosts. > Surely not?!? I've heard of people being off hand about supporting Win95/98 (and I would agree with that) et al..., but surely W2K support should be sacrosanct ?!? Regards, Shaddy