From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tiaan Wessels Subject: Re: Packet duplication Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:43:51 +0000 Message-ID: <471F21E7.2000901@netsys.co.za> References: <47184C6D.40202@netsys.co.za> <47186FC3.6030402@freemail.hu> <471875A4.8010000@netsys.co.za> <471882D0.2060602@freemail.hu> <47188A9A.2080604@netsys.co.za> <003801c81242$c160fec0$0b0ffe0a@NS006819> <471F003A.7090501@netsys.co.za> <001501c81620$a81ac3b0$0b0ffe0a@NS006819> <471F17BC.9060507@netsys.co.za> <001601c81629$cd4831f0$0b0ffe0a@NS006819> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <001601c81629$cd4831f0$0b0ffe0a@NS006819> Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org Rob Sterenborg wrote: >> i could not see any problem in compiling either the kernel or >> iptables. what did strike me as odd was when i ran the ./runme script >> in pom it never asks me for the patch on routing so i answer N to all >> the questions. this right ??? - >> > > I suspect you also couldn't select the ROUTE target when configuring the > kernel. > > Try: > KERNEL_DIR=/path/to/kernel \ > IPTABLES_DIR=/path/to/iptables \ > ./runme --download extra > > looks promising thanks. it said it download ROUTE extra so patched (never asked me to apply ROUTE patch though) and am now compiling kernel again so will let you know in a days time thanks for your philantropy