From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [89.96.204.112] (helo=www-zirak-new.zirak.it) by linuxtogo.org with smtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Ikm71-0002nB-OZ for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:41:55 +0200 Received: (qmail 15858 invoked by uid 64017); 24 Oct 2007 19:01:36 -0000 Received: from 82.58.178.124 (filippo@zirak.it@82.58.178.124) by www-zirak-new (envelope-from , uid 64011) with qmail-scanner-2.01 (uvscan: v5.1.00/v5052. bogofilter: 0.92.0. spamassassin: 3.0.4. Clear:RC:1(82.58.178.124):. Processed in 0.011691 secs); 24 Oct 2007 19:01:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.6?) (filippo@zirak.it@82.58.178.124) by www-zirak-new.zirak.it with SMTP; 24 Oct 2007 19:01:36 -0000 Message-ID: <471F981E.30909@linux.it> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:08:14 +0200 From: Filippo Basso User-Agent: IceDove 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070730) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <470B9D9D.5080501@linux.it> <470D6A2C.1000909@linux.it> In-Reply-To: <470D6A2C.1000909@linux.it> Subject: Re: different hosts, different OE images X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:41:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, can someone tell me if this is an important point, or if I'm just missing something ?!? I've seen that 3 host machines (with different linux distros) gave me 3 different OE results (for i586), one is okay, one is not compiling, one the image has a big problem at login... I want to investigate a bit, some hints ? Just a starting point..... I think that one of the most important points of OE is that is largely independent of host machine, right?!? thank you, phy >> I understood that the results should be highly independent from host >> system, so I begun debugging a bit. >> >> > Hi everybody, > my investigation is going ahead... > The main point is: an image should be highly independent from the host > system, but seems that I've some problem in this regards... maybe my > mistake, but should be understood. > > Another machine (Ubuntu) gave even another different runtime result... :-(