From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from buildserver.ru.mvista.com (unknown [85.21.88.6]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2BEFDDE3E for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 04:15:07 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4720DCE3.4090502@ru.mvista.com> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 22:13:55 +0400 From: Valentine Barshak MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Sealey Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 1/2] USB: Rework OHCI PPC OF for new bindings References: <20071024163412.GA17785@ru.mvista.com> <471FC191.6020704@genesi-usa.com> <200710241850.05467.david-b@pacbell.net> <47208273.8050601@ru.mvista.com> <4720CE3E.5030204@ru.mvista.com> <4720DD18.9000603@genesi-usa.com> In-Reply-To: <4720DD18.9000603@genesi-usa.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: David Brownell , linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Matt Sealey wrote: > Valentine, > > Please do the very minimal required to keep supporting the Efika. > > As for an little endian OHCI controller on an OF bus, I would not > consider it an impossibility. But, not having the big-endian > property fixes this; OHCI is little-endian by default. You need > only report "difference" in device trees, overzealous naming of > a billion kinds of 99.99999% compatible controllers is just a > waste of space. > > I prefer the new binding to a degree. I like the big-endian property > and I like the reporting of a standard controller type (usb-ohci > rather than building in chip names). However by making the driver > support only the recommending binding, we break old platforms for > the sake of making new ones cleaner. > > I wish someone would have sat down and defined the 5200 device > tree in a design committee rather than a peer review post-commit > system. In fact, that is a great idea, we can start this off with > the MPC5121E right now, and get the damn thing RIGHT. > OK, I'll submit a new patch in a bit. Thanks, Valentine.