From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [130.89.2.9] (helo=smtp.utwente.nl) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IlHAF-0002za-3W for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 06:51:19 +0200 Received: from Powerbook-2.local (dominion.kabel.utwente.nl [130.89.193.158]) by smtp.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l9Q4hdUx029610; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 06:43:39 +0200 Message-ID: <47217083.4000103@student.utwente.nl> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 06:43:47 +0200 From: Koen Kooi User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.4 X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact helpdesk@ITBE.utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: k.kooi@student.utwente.nl X-Spam-Status: No Cc: openembedded-commits@openembedded.org Subject: Re: [oe-commits] org.oe.dev packages/webkit: Build and package naming fixes (when using debian renaming) X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 04:51:19 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 freyther commit schreef: > packages/webkit: Build and package naming fixes (when using debian renaming) > We do not want the package to be named libwebkitgtk-launcher but want to > keep the webkit-gtklauncher names. Do we? I created and maintain those recipes, and I made the decision to name it libwebkitgtk-launcher when using debian naming. I would have used DEBIAN_NOAUTONAME_webkit-gtklauncher otherwise. Which brings me to my second point: > +python populate_packages_prepend() { > + print "foooo" > + print bb.data.getVar("DEBIAN_NAMES", d, True) > + if bb.data.getVar("DEBIAN_NAMES", d, True): > + base = bb.data.expand("${PN}launcher", d, True) > + bb.data.setVar("PKG_%s" % base, base, d) > + bb.data.setVar("PKG_%s-dbg" % base, "%s-dbg" % base, d) > +} Using python is unneeded and confusing. And as webkit maintainerin OE, I don't want those in the recipes. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFHIXCDMkyGM64RGpERAqZuAKCsK/Dxm1EPgk0qEp+20dixabuHYwCeLTLv Ztk68CUYd2ByaVgFxEh+67M= =e/yc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----