All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "d. d. gmane" <gmanesensors@dubin.org>
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] Intel DP35DP - P35 Sensor Support?
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 15:58:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4724B1B8.9050805@dubin.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <loom.20071015T022008-788@post.gmane.org>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 13499 bytes --]

Correction...here's the proper sensors detection using 3.0.0rc3:

[root@skippy detect]# pwd
/home/david/lm_sensors-3.0.0-rc3/prog/detect
[root@skippy detect]# ./sensors-detect
# sensors-detect revision 4968 (2007-10-20 10:47:54 +0200)

This program will help you determine which kernel modules you need
to load to use lm_sensors most effectively. It is generally safe
and recommended to accept the default answers to all questions,
unless you know what you're doing.

*We can start with probing for (PCI) I2C or SMBus adapters.
Do you want to probe now? (YES/no):
Probing for PCI bus adapters...
Use driver `i2c-i801' for device 0000:00:1f.3: Intel ICH9*

We will now try to load each adapter module in turn.
*Module `i2c-i801' already loaded.*
If you have undetectable or unsupported adapters, you can have them
scanned by manually loading the modules before running this script.

We are now going to do the I2C/SMBus adapter probings. Some chips may
be double detected; we choose the one with the highest confidence
value in that case.
If you found that the adapter hung after probing a certain address,
you can specify that address to remain unprobed.

Next adapter: SMBus I801 adapter at 4000 (i2c-0)
Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively):
Client found at address 0x44
Probing for `Maxim MAX6633/MAX6634/MAX6635'...              No
Client found at address 0x50
Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1033'...                     No
Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1034'...                     No
Probing for `SPD EEPROM'...                                
Yes
    (confidence 8, not a hardware monitoring chip)
Probing for `EDID EEPROM'...                                No
Client found at address 0x51
Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1033'...                     No
Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1034'...                     No
Probing for `SPD EEPROM'...                                
Yes
    (confidence 8, not a hardware monitoring chip)
Probing for `EDID EEPROM'...                                No
Client found at address 0x52
Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1033'...                     No
Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1034'...                     No
Probing for `SPD EEPROM'...                                 Yes
    (confidence 8, not a hardware monitoring chip)
Probing for `EDID EEPROM'...                                No
Client found at address 0x53
Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1033'...                     No
Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1034'...                     No
Probing for `SPD EEPROM'...                                 Yes
    (confidence 8, not a hardware monitoring chip)
Probing for `EDID EEPROM'...                                No

Next adapter: NVIDIA i2c adapter  (i2c-1)
Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively): Client found at address 0x50
Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1033'...                     No
Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1034'...                     No
Probing for `SPD EEPROM'...                                 No
Probing for `EDID EEPROM'...                                Yes
    (confidence 8, not a hardware monitoring chip)

Next adapter: NVIDIA i2c adapter  (i2c-2)
Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively):
Next adapter: NVIDIA i2c adapter  (i2c-3)
Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively):

Some chips are also accessible through the ISA I/O ports. We have to
write to arbitrary I/O ports to probe them. This is usually safe though.
Yes, you do have ISA I/O ports even if you do not have any ISA slots!
Do you want to scan the ISA I/O ports? (YES/no):
Probing for `National Semiconductor LM78' at 0x290...       No
Probing for `National Semiconductor LM78-J' at 0x290...     No
Probing for `National Semiconductor LM79' at 0x290...       No
Probing for `Winbond W83781D' at 0x290...                   No
Probing for `Winbond W83782D' at 0x290...                   No
Probing for `Silicon Integrated Systems SIS5595'...         No
Probing for `VIA VT82C686 Integrated Sensors'...            No
Probing for `VIA VT8231 Integrated Sensors'...              No
Probing for `IPMI BMC KCS' at 0xca0...                      No
Probing for `IPMI BMC SMIC' at 0xca8...                     No

Some Super I/O chips may also contain sensors. We have to write to
standard I/O ports to probe them. This is usually safe.
Do you want to scan for Super I/O sensors? (YES/no):
Probing for Super-I/O at 0x2e/0x2f
Trying family `National Semiconductor'...                   Yes
Found `Nat. Semi. PC8374L Super IO Sensors'                
    (but not activated)
Probing for Super-I/O at 0x4e/0x4f
Trying family `National Semiconductor'...                   No
Trying family `SMSC'...                                     No
Trying family `VIA/Winbond/Fintek'...                       No
Trying family `ITE'...                                      No

Some CPUs or memory controllers may also contain embedded sensors.
Do you want to scan for them? (YES/no):
AMD K8 thermal sensors...                                   No
AMD K10 thermal sensors...                                  No
*Intel Core family thermal sensor...                         Success!*
    (driver `coretemp')
Intel AMB FB-DIMM thermal sensor...                         No

Now follows a summary of the probes I have just done.
Just press ENTER to continue:

Driver `coretemp' (should be inserted):
  Detects correctly:
  * Chip `Intel Core family thermal sensor' (confidence: 9)

I will now generate the commands needed to load the required modules.
Just press ENTER to continue:

To load everything that is needed, add this to some /etc/rc* file:

#----cut here----
# Chip drivers
modprobe coretemp
# sleep 2 # optional
/usr/bin/sensors -s # recommended
#----cut here----

If you have some drivers built into your kernel, the list above will
contain too many modules. Skip the appropriate ones! You really
should try these commands right now to make sure everything is
working properly. Monitoring programs won't work until the needed
modules are loaded.

Do you want to overwrite /etc/sysconfig/lm_sensors? (YES/no):







d. d. gmane wrote:
> Thank you for the response.  Below is what I get with the latest 
> release...I am unable to gather the fan data or motherboard temps.  
> Using lmsensors with my prior motherboard (a 975xbx), I was able to 
> gather the data.  I mention this because I know that I'm using the 
> same case fans, hence they work.  As a side note, the BIOS hardware 
> monitoring does display the case fans as well.
>
> Full details here -- are there other scans/probes that you would 
> recommend?
>
> [root@skippy detect]# ./sensors-detect
> # sensors-detect revision 4966 (2007-10-20 01:41:53 -0700)
>
> This program will help you determine which kernel modules you need
> to load to use lm_sensors most effectively. It is generally safe
> and recommended to accept the default answers to all questions,
> unless you know what you're doing.
>
> We can start with probing for (PCI) I2C or SMBus adapters.
> Do you want to probe now? (YES/no):
> Probing for PCI bus adapters...
> Use driver `i2c-i801' for device 0000:00:1f.3: Intel ICH9
>
> We will now try to load each adapter module in turn.
> Module `i2c-i801' already loaded.
> If you have undetectable or unsupported adapters, you can have them
> scanned by manually loading the modules before running this script.
>
> To continue, we need module `i2c-dev' to be loaded.
> Do you want to load `i2c-dev' now? (YES/no):
> Module loaded successfully.
>
> We are now going to do the I2C/SMBus adapter probings. Some chips may
> be double detected; we choose the one with the highest confidence
> value in that case.
> If you found that the adapter hung after probing a certain address,
> you can specify that address to remain unprobed.
>
> Next adapter: SMBus I801 adapter at 4000 (i2c-0)
> Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively):
> Client found at address 0x44
> Probing for `Maxim MAX6633/MAX6634/MAX6635'...              No
> Client found at address 0x50
> Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1033'...                     No
> Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1034'...                     No
> Probing for `SPD EEPROM'...                                 Yes
>     (confidence 8, not a hardware monitoring chip)
> Probing for `EDID EEPROM'...                                No
> Client found at address 0x51
> Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1033'...                     No
> Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1034'...                     No
> Probing for `SPD EEPROM'...                                 Yes
>     (confidence 8, not a hardware monitoring chip)
> Probing for `EDID EEPROM'...                                No
> Client found at address 0x52
> Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1033'...                     No
> Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1034'...                     No
> Probing for `SPD EEPROM'...                                 Yes
>     (confidence 8, not a hardware monitoring chip)
> Probing for `EDID EEPROM'...                                No
> Client found at address 0x53
> Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1033'...                     No
> Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1034'...                     No
> Probing for `SPD EEPROM'...                                 Yes
>     (confidence 8, not a hardware monitoring chip)
> Probing for `EDID EEPROM'...                                No
>
> Next adapter: NVIDIA i2c adapter  (i2c-1)
> Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively):
> Client found at address 0x50
> Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1033'...                     No
> Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1034'...                     No
> Probing for `SPD EEPROM'...                                 No
> Probing for `EDID EEPROM'...                                Yes
>     (confidence 8, not a hardware monitoring chip)
>
> Next adapter: NVIDIA i2c adapter  (i2c-2)
> Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively):
>
> Next adapter: NVIDIA i2c adapter  (i2c-3)
> Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively):
>
> Some chips are also accessible through the ISA I/O ports. We have to
> write to arbitrary I/O ports to probe them. This is usually safe though.
> Yes, you do have ISA I/O ports even if you do not have any ISA slots!
> Do you want to scan the ISA I/O ports? (YES/no):
> Probing for `National Semiconductor LM78' at 0x290...       No
> Probing for `National Semiconductor LM78-J' at 0x290...     No
> Probing for `National Semiconductor LM79' at 0x290...       No
> Probing for `Winbond W83781D' at 0x290...                   No
> Probing for `Winbond W83782D' at 0x290...                   No
> Probing for `Silicon Integrated Systems SIS5595'...         No
> Probing for `VIA VT82C686 Integrated Sensors'...            No
> Probing for `VIA VT8231 Integrated Sensors'...              No
> Probing for `IPMI BMC KCS' at 0xca0...                      No
> Probing for `IPMI BMC SMIC' at 0xca8...                     No
>
> Some Super I/O chips may also contain sensors. We have to write to
> standard I/O ports to probe them. This is usually safe.
> Do you want to scan for Super I/O sensors? (YES/no):
> Probing for Super-I/O at 0x2e/0x2f
> Trying family `National Semiconductor'...                   Yes
> Found `Nat. Semi. PC8374L Super IO Sensors'                
>     (but not activated)
> Probing for Super-I/O at 0x4e/0x4f
> Trying family `National Semiconductor'...                   No
> Trying family `SMSC'...                                     No
> Trying family `VIA/Winbond/Fintek'...                       No
> Trying family `ITE'...                                      No
>
> Some CPUs or memory controllers may also contain embedded sensors.
> Do you want to scan for them? (YES/no):
> AMD K8 thermal sensors...                                   No
> AMD K10 thermal sensors...                                  No
> Intel Core family thermal sensor...                         Success!
>     (driver `coretemp')
> Intel AMB FB-DIMM thermal sensor...                         No
>
> Now follows a summary of the probes I have just done.
> Just press ENTER to continue:
>
> Driver `coretemp' (should be inserted):
>   Detects correctly:
>   * Chip `Intel Core family thermal sensor' (confidence: 9)
>
> I will now generate the commands needed to load the required modules.
> Just press ENTER to continue:
>
> To load everything that is needed, add this to some /etc/rc* file:
>
> #----cut here----
> # Chip drivers
> modprobe coretemp
> # sleep 2 # optional
> /usr/bin/sensors -s # recommended
> #----cut here----
>
> If you have some drivers built into your kernel, the list above will
> contain too many modules. Skip the appropriate ones! You really
> should try these commands right now to make sure everything is
> working properly. Monitoring programs won't work until the needed
> modules are loaded.
>
> Do you want to overwrite /etc/sysconfig/lm_sensors? (YES/no):
> [root@skippy detect]#
>
>
> Jean Delvare wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 02:23:17 +0000 (UTC), d.d. wrote:
>>   
>>> I'm seeing only 2 CPU core temperatures, but am unable to pick off any other
>>> sensors (but I know they are there...)
>>>
>>> Any luck with the Intel Desktop DP35DP Motherboard / P35 / ICH9 ?
>>>     
>>
>> The ICH9 integrates sensors we don't support yet. Your motherboard may
>> or may not use these.
>>
>>   
>>> Running Linux Kernel:
>>> 2.6.22.9-91.fc7 #1 SMP Thu Sep 27 20:47:39 EDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64
>>> GNU/Linux
>>>     
>>
>> Did you try running the latest version of sensors-detect? What did it
>> find?
>>
>>   

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 24507 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 153 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-10-28 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-15  2:23 [lm-sensors] Intel DP35DP - P35 Sensor Support? d.d.
2007-10-28 14:26 ` Jean Delvare
2007-10-28 15:43 ` d. d. gmane
2007-10-28 15:58 ` d. d. gmane [this message]
2007-10-30 14:22 ` Jean Delvare
2007-10-30 22:26 ` d. d. gmane
2007-10-31 19:40 ` Jean Delvare
2007-11-01  3:50 ` d. d. gmane
2007-11-02 10:32 ` Jean Delvare

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4724B1B8.9050805@dubin.org \
    --to=gmanesensors@dubin.org \
    --cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.