From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [194.158.229.90] (helo=smtp-auth-be-06.sunrise.ch) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1InKmI-0004fS-5K for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:07:06 +0100 Received: from [192.168.26.12] (212-98-43-140.static.adslpremium.ch [212.98.43.140]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-auth-be-06.sunrise.ch (8.13.1/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l9VCXKvH015932; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:33:20 +0100 Message-ID: <47287669.4050607@vollmann.ch> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:34:49 +0100 From: Detlef Vollmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20070113 Debian/1.7.8-1sarge10 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org References: <471FC1C0.4010103@linux.it> <20071025001926.GA14645@lenovo> <472047C3.20208@student.utwente.nl> <20071025121153.GA8231@lenovo> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: getting started - docbook X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:07:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cliff Brake wrote: > On 10/25/07, David Farning wrote: >>But I am struggling over what to call the object of a bitebake. (In >>make they are call targets .ie make all, but in the embedded world >>target is used to refer to the device for which you are building.) >> >>$bitbake vim >>$bitbake task-base >>$bitbake gpe-image >>$bitbake world >>A package, a task, an image, and world? > > > I suppose it depends -- saying that I'm "building a packages" is > technically correct as the ipk/deb is the output. But, "bitbaking a > recipe" is probably more correct. "bitbaking a recipe" is correct. But "vim" or "task-base" above are not recipes. "vim_7.0.bb" or "task-base.bb" are recipes. I still think "target" (or "build target") would be the best term for "vim" or "task-base", though I agree that this might be confused with the "target device". Detlef