From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@plouf.fr.eu.org>
Subject: Re: Netfilter Performance when using MAC filter
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 20:19:29 +0100
Message-ID: <4728D541.9010308@plouf.fr.eu.org>
References: <54ea295d0710310923x1e5eff5cy6d70445d90d9e56e@mail.gmail.com> <1193855211.18366.73.camel@grateful.d.umn.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Return-path: <netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1193855211.18366.73.camel@grateful.d.umn.edu>
Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org

Hello,

Matt Zagrabelny a =E9crit :
>=20
> If so, you can do MAC filtering (performance shouldn't matter as the =
MAC
> address is in the link header)

Can you please elaborate about the relationship beween filtering=20
performance and the address layer ?