From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bill Davidsen Subject: Re: Implementing low level timeouts within MD Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 10:19:41 -0400 Message-ID: <4729E07D.3080000@tmr.com> References: <1193418753.4771.17.camel@w100> <1193425254.10336.290.camel@firewall.xsintricity.com> <1193521561.7690.14.camel@w100> <1193529329.10336.366.camel@firewall.xsintricity.com> <1193552822.6541.8.camel@w100> <1193678521.10336.486.camel@firewall.xsintricity.com> <1193720887.3876.8.camel@w100> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1193720887.3876.8.camel@w100> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Alberto Alonso Cc: Doug Ledford , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids Alberto Alonso wrote: > On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 13:22 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > > >> What kernels were these under? >> > > > Yes, these 3 were all SATA. The kernels (in the same order as above) > are: > > * 2.4.21-4.ELsmp #1 (Basically RHEL v3) > * 2.6.18-4-686 #1 SMP on a Fedora Core release 2 > * 2.6.17.13 (compiled from vanilla sources) > *Old* kernels. If you are going to build your own kernel, get a new one! > The RocketRAID was configured for all drives as legacy/normal and > software RAID5 across all drives. I wasn't using hardware raid on > the last described system when it crashed. > -- bill davidsen CTO TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979