From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] ticket spinlocks for x86
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 15:36:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <472CF806.9040004@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071101140146.GA26879@wotan.suse.de>
Nick Piggin wrote:
> Just for fun I also had a shot at merging the headers, as they become a
> lot more similar after this with the removal of the paravirt crud.
Glommer posted a set of patches the other day to implement x86-64
paravirt, which unifies lots of things including spinlocks. But if
you've removed the need to diddle with sti/cli, then that works too...
J
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-03 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-01 14:01 [patch 0/4] ticket spinlocks for x86 Nick Piggin
2007-11-01 14:02 ` [patch 1/4] spinlock: lockbreak cleanup Nick Piggin
2007-11-01 14:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-11-01 14:29 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-01 15:39 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-11-01 15:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-01 15:53 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-01 14:03 ` [patch 1/4] x86: FIFO ticket spinlocks Nick Piggin
2007-11-01 14:40 ` Gregory Haskins
2007-11-01 16:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-11-02 0:35 ` Rik van Riel
2007-11-02 1:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-11-02 2:01 ` Rik van Riel
2007-11-02 6:42 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-02 14:05 ` Rik van Riel
2007-11-02 22:37 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-02 15:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-07 8:46 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-02 14:24 ` Gregory Haskins
2007-11-01 20:01 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-11-02 0:00 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-02 16:22 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-11-02 16:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-11-02 23:01 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-03 0:56 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-11-03 3:41 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-01 14:04 ` [patch 3/4] x86: spinlock.h merge prep Nick Piggin
2007-11-01 14:05 ` [patch 4/4] x86: spinlock.h merge Nick Piggin
2007-11-03 22:36 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=472CF806.9040004@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=glommer@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.