From: Albert Lee <albertcc@tw.ibm.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
linux list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: "Fix ATAPI transfer lengths" causes CD writing regression
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 12:02:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <472D445B.1080005@tw.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <472D0D4A.70404@gmail.com>
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Daniel Drake wrote:
>
>>Tejun Heo wrote:
>>
>>>><4>ata2.00: HSM violation: eh_analyze_tf: BUSY|DRQ
>>>><3>ata2.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
>>>><3>ata2.00: cmd a0/00:00:00:0a:00/00:00:00:00:00/a0 tag 0 cdb 0x5a data
>>>>10 in
>>>><4> res 58/00:02:00:0a:00/00:00:00:00:00/a0 Emask 0x2 (HSM
>>>>violation)
>>>><3>ata2.00: status: { DRDY DRQ }
>>>><6>ata2: soft resetting link
>>>><6>ata2.00: configured for UDMA/33
>>>><6>ata2: EH complete
>>>
>>>Does this patch fix the problem?
>>
>>That fixes it, thanks! There is no more ugly error in dmesg, the test
>>prog doesn't print any sense data, and brasero works OK too. However,
>>these messages appear in the kernel log every time I run the test app
>>(or when brasero does its thing):
>>
>><4>ata2.00: 10 bytes trailing data
>><4>ata2.00: 10 bytes trailing data
>><4>ata2.00: 10 bytes trailing data
>><4>ata2.00: 10 bytes trailing data
>><4>ata2.00: 10 bytes trailing data
>><4>ata2.00: 10 bytes trailing data
>><4>ata2.00: 6 bytes trailing data
>
>
> Yeah, that's expected. What's going on here is that your drive sends
> full mode sense data (76bytes) regardless of allocation size in CDB but
> it does honor transfer chunk set in the PACKET TF, which is set to the
> same value as allocation size by Alan's patch. So, now the drive sends
> the 76 bytes in 8 chunks. The first chunk is transferred into the sg
> buffer and the following chunks are thrown away.
>
> Previously, transfer chunk was set to 8k, so the drive claims to
> transfer 76 bytes from the buegging, libata transfers leading 10 bytes
> got transferred into the user buffer and throws away what's remaining.
> The change caused problem because libata HSM always switches to
> HSM_ST_LAST (command sequence completion) after filling the command
> buffer completely. So, throwing away is activated iff the extra data to
> throw away is transfered together with the last chunk of useful data.
>
> With the chunk size reduced to allocation size, the initial chunk fills
> the data buffer completely and all the extra bytes are transfered in
> separate chunks. However, libata HSM expects command sequence to
> complete after the initial chunk but the drive asserts DRQ for the next
> chunk on the following interrupt, so HSM violation is triggered.
>
> The patch modifies HSM such that it keeps throwing away extra data as
> long as the drive asserts DRQ which is how IDE driver does it.
>
>From past experience, some dead ATAPI devices stuck in DRQ=1. We should
take care of such situation, otherwise the HSM might get into an infinite
loop of waiting for the dead ATAPI device to say DRQ=0 and discarding
endless "trailing data".
Maybe we could set a limit here. If the ATAPI device keeps DRQ=1 and
exceeds the limit, we consider it as HSM violation and have EH handle it.
--
albert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-04 4:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-30 15:14 "Fix ATAPI transfer lengths" causes CD writing regression Daniel Drake
2007-10-30 15:34 ` Alan Cox
2007-10-30 17:45 ` Daniel Drake
2007-10-30 18:26 ` Frans Pop
2007-10-30 19:01 ` Alan Cox
2007-10-30 19:21 ` Daniel Drake
2007-10-31 11:49 ` Alan Cox
2007-10-31 11:57 ` Jens Axboe
2007-10-31 12:20 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-31 12:26 ` Jens Axboe
2007-10-31 16:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-31 16:29 ` Alan Cox
2007-10-31 16:34 ` Daniel Drake
2007-10-31 17:55 ` Jens Axboe
2007-11-01 0:40 ` Tejun Heo
2007-11-01 7:24 ` Tejun Heo
2007-11-01 10:50 ` Alan Cox
2007-10-31 12:49 ` Alan Cox
2007-11-01 9:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-11-01 10:53 ` Alan Cox
2007-11-01 11:09 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-11-01 14:15 ` Alan Cox
2007-11-01 15:33 ` Daniel Drake
2007-11-01 15:57 ` Alan Cox
2007-11-01 16:06 ` Tejun Heo
2007-11-01 16:04 ` Tejun Heo
2007-11-02 21:19 ` Daniel Drake
2007-11-03 1:17 ` Tejun Heo
2007-11-03 12:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-11-03 20:02 ` Daniel Drake
2007-11-04 0:07 ` Tejun Heo
2007-11-04 4:02 ` Albert Lee [this message]
2007-11-04 23:42 ` Alan Cox
2007-11-05 0:05 ` Tejun Heo
2007-11-05 13:03 ` Alan Cox
2007-11-06 10:18 ` Tejun Heo
2007-11-06 12:48 ` Alan Cox
2007-11-05 0:15 ` Daniel Drake
2007-11-02 17:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-30 16:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-30 16:10 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=472D445B.1080005@tw.ibm.com \
--to=albertcc@tw.ibm.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=albertl@mail.com \
--cc=dsd@gentoo.org \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.