From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michal Soltys Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 22:01:52 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] HFSC and that ATM overhead problem (Another VOIP QoS Message-Id: <472E4150.9060702@ziu.info> List-Id: References: <20071104230419.6987d1d1@ns.fogwatch.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20071104230419.6987d1d1@ns.fogwatch.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Giovanni Bajo wrote: > On dom, 2007-11-04 at 23:04 +1100, Fog_Watch wrote: > >> HFSC appears to be the queueing discipline of choice for VOIP. > > Is it? Any pointers? Well, it can decouple bandwidth and delay. And both are important here. Some documentation pointers: http://linux-ip.net/articles/hfsc.en/ http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~istoica/hfsc-tr.ps.gz (deep, but good read) http://www.sonycsl.co.jp/~kjc/software/TIPS.txt (regarding implementation in *BSD) http://marc.info/?t7799591400001&r=1&w=2 _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc