All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Module init call vs symbols exporting race?
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 12:20:58 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <473031FA.2060707@openvz.org> (raw)

Hi.

I looked at the sys_init_module() and found that the ->init callback
for the module is called without the module_mutex held and *after*
the module's symbols are exported. Doesn't this create the race when
loading two modules in parallel? Like this.

Consider the first module to be (without any internal locking for
simplicity)

=== foo.c ===
static struct list_head foo_list;

void foo_register(struct list_head *elem)
{
	list_add(elem, &foo_list);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(foo_register);

static int foo_init(void)
{
	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&foo_list);
}
module_init(foo_init);
===

and the second one

=== bar.c ===
struct bar_struct {
	struct list_head list;
	...
} bar;

static int bar_init(void)
{
	foo_register(&bar.list);
}
module_init(bar_init);
===

If I understand the sys_init_module() right, the following code
flow is possible:

1CPU                                        2CPU
sys_init_module(/* foo module */)           sys_init_module(/* bar module */)
  mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
  load_module();
      /* export the foo_init here */
  mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
                                            mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
                                            load_module();
                                                /* resolve the foo_init here */
                                            mutex_unlock(&mudule_mutex);
                                            mod->init(); /* bar_init */
           /*
            * OOPS! The foo_list is not ready yet, because the foo_init
            * is not called yet.
            */
  mod->init(); /* foo_init... too late */

Is this analysis correct?

Thanks,
Pavel

             reply	other threads:[~2007-11-06  9:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-06  9:20 Pavel Emelyanov [this message]
2007-11-06 12:41 ` Module init call vs symbols exporting race? Rusty Russell
2007-11-07 10:01   ` Jan Glauber
2007-11-08  2:10     ` Rusty Russell
2007-11-09 11:44       ` Jon Masters
2007-11-09 12:16         ` Jan Glauber
2007-11-10  7:27           ` Rusty Russell
2007-11-12 14:03             ` Jan Glauber
2007-11-09 16:06       ` Jan Glauber
2007-11-10 20:23     ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=473031FA.2060707@openvz.org \
    --to=xemul@openvz.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.