All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Nowoczynski <pauln@psc.edu>
To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
Subject: [Lustre-devel] Checksum Algorithm
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 14:57:50 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4730C73E.3080606@psc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200711061130.32694.behlendorf1@llnl.gov>

Brian,
How does the crc mechanism work?  I assume that the crc is done at the 
client, does the server verify the crc?   Also are the crc's stored on disk?
thanks,
paul

Brian Behlendorf wrote:
> Roger,
>
>   We've been running with checksums enabled in our release for some time now
> and have seen the exact same impact on performance.  In our case single node
> performance is impacted but aggregate FS performance remains good when enough
> clients are involved.  We are tracking the performance issue under bug 13805
> and would love any input/insight you might have on the issue.
>
>   Bug13805 <https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13805>
>
>   My view on the issue is that it is madness to run with checksums disabled
> and we need to investigate more efficient checksum algorithms.  The current
> crc32 algorithm may be too heavy weight but the simple XOR algorithm you
> propose I fear is not strong enough.  I've seen to many cases now of various
> network components corrupting data in all sorts of interesting ways.
> Happily we have a lot of other choices for algorithms to investigate.
>
>   If you have the time I'd encourage you to investigate an assortment of
> algorithms and see which work best.  Making this a runtime option via 
> proc I think is also an excellent idea.
>
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-devel mailing list
> Lustre-devel at clusterfs.com
> https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-devel
>   

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-06 19:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-06 16:59 [Lustre-devel] Checksum Algorithm RS RS
2007-11-06 19:30 ` Brian Behlendorf
2007-11-06 19:57   ` Paul Nowoczynski [this message]
2007-11-07  8:39   ` Niklas Edmundsson
2007-11-07 20:05 ` Andreas Dilger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4730C73E.3080606@psc.edu \
    --to=pauln@psc.edu \
    --cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.