From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cedric Le Goater Subject: Re: Pid namespaces problems Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 09:28:29 +0100 Message-ID: <4731772D.3060806@fr.ibm.com> References: <472AE42F.5000602@openvz.org> <47301A14.9040304@openvz.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <47301A14.9040304-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Pavel Emelyanov Cc: Linux Containers , "Eric W. Biederman" , Benjamin Thery List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org > >> - There are several architectures with their own signal functions for >> other OS compatibility that have are using _pid and not _vpid >> variants of functions. (irix and solaris) >> arch/mips/kernel/irixsig.c:irix_waitsys >> arch/mips/kernel/sysirix.c:irix_setpgrp >> arch/sparc64/solaris/misc.c:solaris_procids > > Ok. Looks like your list is the same as mine. That's good to hear > that I haven't missed anything important. We've also talked about af_unix credentials. > So, I see that you're about to take a closer look at the pid > namespaces. If so, then what time can we expect the net namespace > activity to go on? Or (if you don't mind) can we start merging > the patches to David as soon as he opens his 2.6.25 merge window? I think daniel and benjamin are also getting ready for the 2.6.25 merge window. C.