From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dragan Noveski Subject: Re: 2.6.23.1-rt9 (and others) Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:10:56 +0000 Message-ID: <4731D580.5000902@gmx.net> References: <1194413959.8827.66.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4731C90E.7030509@gmx.net> <47317A05.BA47.005A.0@novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:56378 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1756076AbXKGOOa (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2007 09:14:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: <47317A05.BA47.005A.0@novell.com> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org Gregory Haskins wrote: > Doh! Your error made me realize that I broke uniprocessor in -rt9. Will fix right away. > > As far as -rt7 is concerned, that doesn't make a lot of sense since cpupri isnt introduced until -rt9. Perhaps your tree was dirtied from a previous application of -rt9? Let me know if that doesn't appear to be the case. > > Regards, > -Greg > > > sorry, i am not sure if i did not done some missmatch by copying the config file into the tree, but i am always doing 'rm -r', and unpacking the tree before compiling. i tried again the rt9 (100% without missmatching) but it does not work.... i ll give a try with the rt6 now. very much thanks for the support and cheers, doc