All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@novell.com>
To: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"LKML" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"RT" <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: 2.6.23.1-rt9 (and others)
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:51:23 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4731FB1B.BA47.005A.0@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0711071040210.8572@gandalf.stny.rr.com>

>>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2007 at 10:41 AM, in message
<Pine.LNX.4.58.0711071040210.8572@gandalf.stny.rr.com>, Steven Rostedt
<rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote: 

> 
> So please compare -rt7, -rt8 and -rt10.

Here are my results from running:

sudo chrt -f 80 ./cyclictest -n -p 90 -t 8 -d 100 -i 100

with

while true; do make mrproper; make allmodconfig; make -j 128 > /dev/null; done
 on a plain kernel.org kernel

running in the background on an 8-way (4core x2) C2D Xeon 5335 system

23.1-rt7
---------------------------

  144.60 135.30 116.38 30/814 8184

  T: 0 ( 5990) P:90 I:100 C:11560415 Min:2 Act:  5 Avg: 4 Max:  83
  T: 1 ( 5991) P:89 I:200 C:5780208 Min: 2 Act:  5 Avg: 4 Max:  66
  T: 2 ( 5992) P:88 I:300 C:3853472 Min: 2 Act:  5 Avg: 5 Max:  89
  T: 3 ( 5993) P:87 I:400 C:2890104 Min: 2 Act:  6 Avg: 5 Max:  70
  T: 4 ( 5994) P:86 I:500 C:2312083 Min: 2 Act:  4 Avg: 5 Max:  91
  T: 5 ( 5995) P:85 I:600 C:1926736 Min: 2 Act:  5 Avg: 5 Max:  94
  T: 6 ( 5996) P:84 I:700 C:1651488 Min: 2 Act: 12 Avg: 5 Max: 115
  T: 7 ( 5997) P:83 I:800 C:1445052 Min: 2 Act:  6 Avg: 5 Max:  79

23.1-rt8
---------------------------
  119.95 106.56 107.98 37/811 18445

  T: 0 ( 5052) P:90 I:100 C:29592746 Min: 2 Act: 21 Avg: 4 Max:  78
  T: 1 ( 5053) P:89 I:200 C:14796374 Min: 2 Act:  6 Avg: 4 Max:  81
  T: 2 ( 5054) P:88 I:300 C:9864249 Min:  2 Act: 10 Avg: 4 Max:  88
  T: 3 ( 5055) P:87 I:400 C:7398187 Min:  2 Act:  6 Avg: 4 Max:  86
  T: 4 ( 5056) P:86 I:500 C:5918550 Min:  2 Act: 13 Avg: 9 Max:  69
  T: 5 ( 5057) P:85 I:600 C:4932125 Min:  2 Act: 11 Avg: 4 Max:  71
  T: 6 ( 5058) P:84 I:700 C:4227536 Min:  2 Act:  8 Avg: 5 Max:  65
  T: 7 ( 5059) P:83 I:800 C:3699094 Min:  2 Act:  4 Avg: 4 Max: 114

23.1-rt10
---------------------------
  143.39 123.49 117.92 22/791 5802

  T: 0 ( 5305) P:90 I:100 C:45332860 Min: 2 Act:  4 Avg: 4 Max: 89
  T: 1 ( 5306) P:89 I:200 C:22666431 Min: 2 Act:  3 Avg: 5 Max: 49
  T: 2 ( 5307) P:88 I:300 C:15110954 Min: 2 Act:  6 Avg: 5 Max: 76
  T: 3 ( 5308) P:87 I:400 C:11333216 Min: 2 Act:  7 Avg: 5 Max: 81
  T: 4 ( 5309) P:86 I:500 C:9066572 Min:  2 Act:  8 Avg: 5 Max: 57
  T: 5 ( 5310) P:85 I:600 C:7555477 Min:  2 Act:  8 Avg: 5 Max: 55
  T: 6 ( 5311) P:84 I:700 C:6476123 Min:  2 Act: 14 Avg: 6 Max: 73
  T: 7 ( 5312) P:83 I:800 C:5666608 Min:  2 Act:  5 Avg: 6 Max: 78

note that the rt10 image was running for a much longer duration than the other two...which generally will push the max higher.  I know in general if I let -rt7 go that long it will hit 120-150+.  This means these tests were biased towards -rt7 and -rt8 performing better, but they still came in with higher latencies.

I will officially test -rt11 next, tho in my small runs so far it looks great.

HTH

Regards,
-Greg

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-07 22:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-07  5:39 2.6.23.1-rt9 (and others) Steven Rostedt
2007-11-07 14:17 ` Dragan Noveski
2007-11-07 13:40   ` Gregory Haskins
2007-11-07 15:10     ` Dragan Noveski
2007-11-07 16:33       ` Steven Rostedt
2007-11-07 20:40         ` Dragan Noveski
2007-11-07 18:10     ` Dragan Noveski
2007-11-07 18:11     ` Dragan Noveski
2007-11-07 14:20 ` [PATCH] RT: fix uniprocessor build issue with new scheduler enhancements Gregory Haskins
2007-11-07 15:41 ` 2.6.23.1-rt9 (and others) Steven Rostedt
2007-11-07 22:51   ` Gregory Haskins [this message]
2007-11-07 20:41 ` Dragan Noveski
2007-11-07 19:59   ` Steven Rostedt
2007-11-07 21:04     ` Dragan Noveski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4731FB1B.BA47.005A.0@novell.com \
    --to=ghaskins@novell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.