From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1IpreW-0007G8-IM for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:37:32 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IpreV-0007EG-5U for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:37:31 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IpreU-0007CS-66 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:37:30 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IpreT-0007Bx-Rb for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:37:29 -0500 Received: from pne-smtpout3-sn1.fre.skanova.net ([81.228.11.120]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IpreP-000768-Dq for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:37:30 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (88.193.32.97) by pne-smtpout3-sn1.fre.skanova.net (7.3.129) id 4717E5DD00113BA5 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 7 Nov 2007 21:37:05 +0100 Message-ID: <47322185.2040005@nic.fi> Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 22:35:17 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?VmVzYSBKw6TDpHNrZWzDpGluZW4=?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <4730DDB8.4090902@nic.fi> <20071107201907.GB10337@thorin> In-Reply-To: <20071107201907.GB10337@thorin> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) Subject: Re: grub2 ChangeLog term/i386/pc/serial.c X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 20:37:31 -0000 Robert Millan wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 11:33:44PM +0200, Vesa J=C3=A4=C3=A4skel=C3=A4i= nen wrote: >>> * term/i386/pc/serial.c (serial_hw_put): Switch order of arguments >>> in grub_outb() calls. >> Why on earth those parameters are reversed anyway :) ? >=20 > My fault :-) >=20 > When I replaced inb() and outb() in that file, I assumed they would hav= e > the same semantics as grub_inb() and grub_outb(). Just to be clear, I would have understood your rational ordering better than current version ;) > grub_inb() and grub_outb() are based on the inb()/outb() implementation > from glibc headers, so I kept the same arguments for consistency. I see... Once again inconsistency introduced by Unix folks... as AT&T assembler wouldn't be enough, they then poisons C libs too... oh well... another thing to try to keep in mind...