From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.genesi-usa.com (mithrandir.softwarenexus.net [66.98.186.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FC57DDDF3 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 09:37:50 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <4732396D.4040904@genesi-usa.com> Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 22:17:17 +0000 From: Matt Sealey MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jon Smirl Subject: Re: use of fsl, in lite5200b.dts in git current References: <9e4733910711071355l75da5444kb7082692f1bdc0@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9e4733910711071355l75da5444kb7082692f1bdc0@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Jon Smirl wrote: > Sometimes the fsl prefix is being used and sometimes it isn't. Look at > the two compatible strings. Which way is it going to be? Is > fsl,has-wdt right? fsl,has-wdt is right, at least since someone changed it. -- Matt Sealey Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations