From: David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com>
To: Chris Eddington <chrise@synplicity.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raid5 assemble after dual sata port failure
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 10:33:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4732E5F0.7080805@dgreaves.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47321FDF.8060207@synplicity.com>
Chris Eddington wrote:
>
> Hi,
Hi
>
> While on vacation I had one SATA port/cable fail, and then four hours
> later a second one fail. After fixing/moving the SATA ports, I can
> reboot and all drives seem to be OK now, but when assembled it won't
> recognize the filesystem.
That's unusual - if the array comes back then you should be OK.
In general if two devices fail then there is a real data loss risk.
However if the drives are good and there was just a cable glitch, then unless
you're unlucky it's usually fsck fixable.
I see
mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 3 drives (out of 4).
which means it's now up and running.
And:
sda1 Events : 0.4880374
sdb1 Events : 0.4880374
sdc1 Events : 0.4857597
sdd1 Events : 0.4880374
so sdc1 is way out of date... we'll add/resync that when everything else is working.
but:
> After futzing around with assemble options
> like --force and disk order I couldn't get it to work.
Let me check... what commands did you use? Just 'assemble' - which doesn't care
about disk order - or did you try to re-'create' the array - which does care
about disk order and leads us down a different path...
err, scratch that:
> Creation Time : Sun Nov 5 14:25:01 2006
OK, it was created a year ago... so you did use assemble.
It is slightly odd to see that the drive order is:
/dev/mapper/sda1
/dev/mapper/sdb1
/dev/mapper/sdd1
/dev/mapper/sdc1
Usually people just create them in order.
Have you done any fsck's that involve a write?
What filesystem are you running? What does your 'fsck -n' (readonly) report?
Also, please report the results of:
cat /proc/mdadm
mdadm -D /dev/md0
cat /etc/mdadm.conf
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-08 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-07 20:28 Raid5 assemble after dual sata port failure Chris Eddington
2007-11-08 10:33 ` David Greaves [this message]
2007-11-09 21:23 ` Chris Eddington
2007-11-10 0:28 ` Chris Eddington
2007-11-10 9:16 ` David Greaves
2007-11-10 18:46 ` Chris Eddington
2007-11-11 17:09 ` David Greaves
2007-11-11 17:41 ` Chris Eddington
2007-11-11 22:49 ` David Greaves
2007-11-12 1:01 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-11-17 6:31 ` Chris Eddington
2007-11-18 12:25 ` David Greaves
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-11-07 20:23 chrise
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4732E5F0.7080805@dgreaves.com \
--to=david@dgreaves.com \
--cc=chrise@synplicity.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.