From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Taylor Subject: Re: NAT for multiple non-directly connected subnets Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 16:37:56 -0600 Message-ID: <47338FC4.5040100@riverviewtech.net> References: <1194559495.19115.105.camel@grateful.d.umn.edu> <1194560755.19115.110.camel@grateful.d.umn.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Mail List - Netfilter On 11/08/07 16:34, Bradley Kite wrote: > I tried this with the same results I'm afraid. If I cannot get this > working then I'll have to make the upstream router do NAT too so that > the entire network is seen from the address of the up-stream router - > as Linux is NATing that address without problems. Something (else) is wrong here. > Or maybe I'll try a kernel upgrade to see if that makes any > difference. I doubt that will make any difference. Can we see the output of iptables-save? Grant. . . .