Re: Overriding package config files in OE

[Leon Woestenberg <leon.woestenberg@gmail.com>]

Hello,


Koen Kooi wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Cliff Brake schreef:
>   
>> On 11/2/07, Philip Balister <philip@balister.org> wrote:
>>     
>>> Cliff Brake wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Another approach I've been thinking about is to figure out a way for
>>>> bitbake to use <files> from a tree outside the main OE tree.  One
>>>> possibility is for bitbake to pull <files> as well as bb files from a
>>>> high priority bbcollections tree, even though the bb remains in the
>>>> main OE tree.  This probably totally breaks the way bitbake works, but
>>>>         
>>> I think that having an overlay set up as a high priority collection does
>>> work.
>>>       
>> I was referring to the case where I only put the files directory in
>> the overlay -- not the entire recipe directory.  I have not tried this
>> lately and will do so the next time I get a chance.
>>
>>     
Only copying files, and not the recipes, to an overlay, does not work.

It would be quite nice, but I understand the complexities if every FILE 
has to be
search for in all the collections.

The current behaviour is, as I understand:

If no PREFERED_VERSION, select highest version of a package, else 
PREFERED_VERSION.
Iterate through collections by priority, select the collection that 
provides the "package-version".
Use that collection as the base directory for accessing FILES.

> You could also do it the openmoko way by defining extra overrides and
> using those in FILESPATH.
>   
Thanks, will look into this as well,

Regards,

Leon Woestenberg.