From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: linux-ata.org contributions Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 20:57:47 -0500 Message-ID: <4737B31B.4040801@garzik.org> References: <47362C63.7080108@garzik.org> <47362C9B.6090809@garzik.org> <20071110230324.3647cdf5@the-village.bc.nu> <4736395D.1080102@garzik.org> <4737A9E7.5010200@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:53912 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751974AbXKLB5x (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Nov 2007 20:57:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4737A9E7.5010200@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: Alan Cox , IDE/ATA development list , Albert Lee Tejun Heo wrote: > Jeff Garzik wrote: >> I wouldn't push it out unless it looked OK in my browser. >> >> But overall I tend to dislike wikis. They enable collaboration, but >> tend to be uniformly ugly, cumbersome, and CPU intensive. > > Besides collaboration, one thing I like about wikis is that updating the > page is an one-step process. You can just go there and edit things > directly and pages are updated and history is recorded immediately. > Compared to normal web pages where you have to go through one or a few > iterations of edit -> view -> check in if you wanna -> upload / send > pages, it's just more efficient. > > Well, I also dislike editing html pages directly and pages generated by > openoffice is ugly. > > So, my preference is a wiki. I don't care which wiki it is as long as I > can edit and view it directly. So noted, it sounds like a wiki it greatly preferred by all involved. I'll look around for one I like. Expect no action until Nov 16 at the earliest, of course... Jeff